Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Anthony Ewins: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:15, 14 July 2018

Jack Anthony Ewins

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These same concerns also apply to Ewins' creative partner, article found at:

Not notable under WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Two reliable sources cover solely in the context of being "ascended fanboys" who got noticed for their JW fansite and hired by Universal. No other significant coverage. Otherwise the page, before cleanup, was almost entirely a promotional summary of the sites they created.

On an additional note: the article was moved from draftspace by an account that had been dormant for 10 years, only to come back and begin writing about both Ewins and Glover on Jurassic World articles. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC); edited 21:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that if the subjects were just "marketers" there would be little reason for a Wikipedia page. However, Trevorrow has publicly stated in a previous tweet that they are "creative consultants". Given they've significantly shaped the Jurassic canon there are grounds to push them as creative writers/Jurassic consultants, given the uniqueness of their roles. Further coverage now includes: https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/perth-mans-incredible-ride-to-hollywood-on-the-back-of-dinosaurs-ng-b88896456z - howzat_out 13:03, 14 July 2018 UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howzat out (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:MILL. How would any reasonable editor think these are notable people? 22:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:04, 14 July 2018 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,729 edits m Signing comment by Howzat out - "" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:15, 14 July 2018 edit undo Bearian (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers 84,593 edits delete, reasons Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England\|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:WilliamJE\|...William]], is the complaint department really on [[User talk:WilliamJE\|the roof?]] 10:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England\|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:WilliamJE\|...William]], is the complaint department really on [[User talk:WilliamJE\|the roof?]] 10:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
			*'''Delete''' per [[WP:SNOW]] and [[WP:MILL]]. How would [[Reasonable person\|any reasonable editor]] think these are notable people? 22:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)