Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Levy: Difference between revisions
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 17:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 17:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' while I did not approve this page through AfC I did comment "My gut says he is notable. He is certainly prolific and funded by the CBC is impressive. Anything that can be added where other people talk about him and his work would be very helpful to establish notability" This is just a new stub and can be expanded. There are many pages in AfC that are far more worthy of deletion then this page. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 17:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' while I did not approve this page through AfC I did comment "My gut says he is notable. He is certainly prolific and funded by the CBC is impressive. Anything that can be added where other people talk about him and his work would be very helpful to establish notability" This is just a new stub and can be expanded. There are many pages in AfC that are far more worthy of deletion then this page. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 17:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
::Notability is not demonstrated by how prolific a person is, it's demonstrated by how much attention he does or doesn't receive as the ''subject'' of coverage. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 20:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
::Notability is not demonstrated by how prolific a person is, it's demonstrated by how much attention he does or doesn't receive as the ''subject'' of coverage, and an individual CBC station in a media market is not the same thing as the national network. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 20:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I kept this during a round of G13 tagging. Pinging [[User:Chetsford]] as the one who accepted the draft. --<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#aaa;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:10pt"> » [[User:shadowowl|<span style="color:#525252">Shadowowl</span>]] | [[User_talk:Shadowowl|<span style="color:#4F7D7D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I kept this during a round of G13 tagging. Pinging [[User:Chetsford]] as the one who accepted the draft. --<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#aaa;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:10pt"> » [[User:shadowowl|<span style="color:#525252">Shadowowl</span>]] | [[User_talk:Shadowowl|<span style="color:#4F7D7D">talk</span>]]</span> 18:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 21 July 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joshua Levy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a writer, who doesn't have a strong claim of notability under WP:AUTHOR or particularly strong reliable source coverage to carry a WP:GNG pass. He's the bylined creator, not the subject, of 10 of the 12 footnotes, and one more is his "our contributors" note in the general episode preview of one of the first ten — but, as always, writers do not get over our notability standards by being the creators of coverage about other things, they get over our notability standards by being the subject of coverage written by other people. Which means the only source here that isn't a complete non-starter in terms of establishing his notability is #4, "Montreal is in my DNA" — but that piece of coverage is from the same media outlet that hired him for the closest thing to an actual notability claim here, which means it isn't independent of him for the purposes of helping him get over GNG. All of which means that nothing here is enough to deem him notable. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep while I did not approve this page through AfC I did comment "My gut says he is notable. He is certainly prolific and funded by the CBC is impressive. Anything that can be added where other people talk about him and his work would be very helpful to establish notability" This is just a new stub and can be expanded. There are many pages in AfC that are far more worthy of deletion then this page. Legacypac (talk) 17:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Notability is not demonstrated by how prolific a person is, it's demonstrated by how much attention he does or doesn't receive as the subject of coverage, and an individual CBC station in a media market is not the same thing as the national network. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I kept this during a round of G13 tagging. Pinging User:Chetsford as the one who accepted the draft. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)