Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Ronner-Grubačić: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
added to afd lists.
Line 15: Line 15:


:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:AmericanAir88|AmericanAir88]] ([[User talk:AmericanAir88|talk]]) 01:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:AmericanAir88|AmericanAir88]] ([[User talk:AmericanAir88|talk]]) 01:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Netherlands|list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 01:47, 22 July 2018

Stella Ronner-Grubačić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion requested via OTRS by subject's representative. Their rationale is given below. As the nominator, I am filing this solely on their behalf, and take no position myself as to whether the article should be kept or deleted.

Nomination rationale:

  • the person/ subject of the article is not a notable person
  • the topic has NOT received significant coverage in reliable sources; even more, the quoted sources are unreliable, trivial, not-objective, biased, non-independent, paid media controlled by anti-EU political activists. The whole article is the malicious product of a political activist who calls himself Bukovina Sengen, (a hint to local political issues).
  • the Wikipedia article makes negative assumptions, without providing needed context, by narrowing down the whole biography of the Ambassador to just two so called controversies.
  • the articles passes along a random hoax and gossips, posting indiscriminate collections of information. Yunshui  13:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Typically individuals that are Official Diplomatic Ambassadors qualify for inclusion, here at Wikipedia, under WP:NPOL. As Ms. Ronner-Grubačić is the Netherlands Offical Ambassador to Romania and Moldova, which is cited and referenced in the article. In addition, I found the article well written – well sourced – and not showing any unduly weighted Point of View. Yes, there is a Heading 2.2 Controversy, however, again found it cited and sourced. ShoesssS Talk 15:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]