Wittman v. Personhuballah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →top: HTTP→HTTPS for SCOTUS, Oyez Project and Cornell Law, per BRFA 8 using AWB |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
||
[[Category:Gerrymandering]] |
[[Category:Gerrymandering]] |
||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court]] |
|||
Revision as of 09:24, 26 July 2018
| Wittman v. Personhuballah | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 21, 2016 Decided May 23, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Robert J. Wittman, et al., Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah, et al. |
| Docket no. | 14–1504 |
| Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to pursue their appeal.[1] The case dealt with redistricting by the Virginia Legislature of Virginia's Third Congressional District and allegations of gerrymandering based upon race.[2] The appeal was brought by Congressmen David Brat, Randy Forbes, and Rob Wittman.[2]
References
- ^ "Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-05-30.
- ^ a b Wittman v. Personhuballah, 136 S.Ct. 1732, 1733 (2016); 14-1504.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |