Talk:Mystery Case Files: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:50, 28 July 2018

Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst Unlocked was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 July 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mystery Case Files. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mystery Case Files article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Mystery Case Files" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

AfD

Articles related to this series are being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Case Files: Key to Ravenhearst. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete the page now that the discussion is over? And I don’t like the term « Run-of-the-Mill » that insulting and prefer the « Ordinary » term that is more respectful. « Run-of-the-mill » is say as prejudice for casual playing (gaming is not a real word) so how can we disscute of the validity of the articles now. 205.236.230.117 (talk)

No consensus mean none of the articles will be deleted. The discussion itself can't be deleted for policy reasons, and I am sure the closing administrator has no prejudice for any type of games. 'Run-of-the-mill' means the same as 'Ordinary' as far as I know. There is no longer a need to debate the deletion, so any further efforts should be in improving the articles themselves. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we change the quality scale of the article on Start if it's possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.236.230.117 (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Pages

Can you split the Ravenhearst Unlocked and deleting the page for when more sources for this game will appear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.128.43 (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here some arguments
1. The game was already in a discussion of deletion, and it have no consensus Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Case Files: Key to Ravenhearst so the current discussion is useless and have reason and must be merge with the previous one.
2. Sure is not notable because wikipedia hate the Casual Playing, so for them no casual games are notables and the sources for this kind of game is not reliable. But for the Casual Playing sphere his notability is medium but not great.
3. I understand that the more recents games are not concidared notables, but the 9 firsts games are totally notables.
4. There is not notable because the of the prejudice of casual playing in the world.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.128.43 (talk • contribs)

To reply.

New deletion discussions can happen after one has been closed, that is what happened here.
Wikipedia does not hate casual playing.
There are many reliable sources for Mystery Case Files in general, just not enough for an article on every single version.
Some of the games are notable because there are more reliable sources written about them.
It is possible that the world in general is prejudiced against casual playing, Wikipedia cannot help here.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but if we bring more sources, can we split the two articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.128.43 (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, to make it easier you can work on Draft:Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst Unlocked and add sources to it. The article can be (re)published via WP:AFC when ready. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it will make more easier to create an article instead of make war that I don't wont. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.128.43 (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thank you. Since you don't have an account you may not be able to edit the draft immediately due to semi-protection. I have applied for an administrator to unprotect the page, this should happen shortly. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:48, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there time limit for the draft or we can keep as many time it’s necessary?72.10.128.43 (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It can stay forever as long as it is being worked on. This just means it will be deleted if it has not been edited at all by anyone for six months. If that happens then it can be easily undeleted again on request. So drafts are safe. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And if it happen, how to make the request?72.10.128.43 (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simply make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, you can get back almost any deleted draft that way, even if you never edited it. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the revie of the draft is not approved, can we retry on the future?Frapril (talk) 02:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it's possible, you can transfert the draft in my sand box.Frapril (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can Casual Game Review be considered as reliable or not.72.10.128.43 (talk) 20:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure. this wikiproject page has an inconclusive debate on it and is the best place to ask. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The site is not All About Casual Game it's another site.

Yes I got them confused. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 ::::::::And if it happen, how to make the request?[[Special:Contributions/72.10.128.43|72.10.128.43]] ([[User talk:72.10.128.43|talk]]) 13:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 :::::::::Simply make a request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion]], you can get back almost any deleted draft that way, even if you never edited it. &mdash; [[User:Frayae|Frayæ]] ([[User talk:Frayae|Talk]]/[[:is:Notandaspjall:Frayae|Spjall]]) 14:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
+* If the revie of the draft is not approved, can we retry on the future?[[User:Frapril|Frapril]] ([[User talk:Frapril|talk]]) 02:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If it's possible, you can transfert the draft in my sand box.[[User:Frapril|Frapril]] ([[User talk:Frapril|talk]]) 14:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)