Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Pirhaji: Difference between revisions
wordsmithing |
Jesswade88 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Ultimately, this reads like an article on the company ReviveMed with some mild puffery and a sentence on her education splashed in from her Bloomberg company profile. I'm sure she'll eventually warrant an article but this feels forced and too soon. [[User:Wolfson5|Wolfson5]] ([[User talk:Wolfson5|talk]]) 21:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC) |
Ultimately, this reads like an article on the company ReviveMed with some mild puffery and a sentence on her education splashed in from her Bloomberg company profile. I'm sure she'll eventually warrant an article but this feels forced and too soon. [[User:Wolfson5|Wolfson5]] ([[User talk:Wolfson5|talk]]) 21:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
Hello! I've changed it to being a page more about the company with a small section on Leila. Admit it is maybe too soon. Let me know what you think [[User:Wolfson5|Wolfson5]]. Apologies for puffery, trying to stop doing it. [[User:Jesswade88|Jesswade88]] ([[User talk:Jesswade88|talk]]) 09:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:04, 2 August 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Leila Pirhaji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are several quality sources here, however, they are about Dr Pirhaji's company, and only mention the subject in the context of a passing quote from her as CEO. Other sources - such as papers Pirhaji has written - are not WP:INDEPENDENT. The only article about Prijahi is this in a business journal [1] which, while fine, isn't enough on its own to establish GNG. Pirhaji also doesn't seem to meet WP:NACADEMIC (h-index of 6 [2]).
Some of the sources also don't support the statements which they're used to support. In one example, this link to the company's website [3] is a pass-through link [4], neither of which mention Pirhaji at all. But they're used to support the statement "she received funding from ... MIT100K."
Ultimately, this reads like an article on the company ReviveMed with some mild puffery and a sentence on her education splashed in from her Bloomberg company profile. I'm sure she'll eventually warrant an article but this feels forced and too soon. Wolfson5 (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I've changed it to being a page more about the company with a small section on Leila. Admit it is maybe too soon. Let me know what you think Wolfson5. Apologies for puffery, trying to stop doing it. Jesswade88 (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)