Talk:Human communication: Difference between revisions
→top: Added {{Vital article}} |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|class=Start}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Anthropology|class=start}} |
{{WikiProject Anthropology|class=start}} |
Revision as of 07:23, 6 August 2018
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
My thoughts about this article and Intrapersonal communication
Human communication is a vast subject (since it encompasses nonverbal communication, speech, writing, visual, Internet etc.) and I think this article might become much longer in the future. I added some mentions of these different types of communication into the article. But I think the first item in the list of communication types, "Intrapersonal communication (communication with oneself)" could be removed since I think this article is about communication between humans. Maybe move it to the "See also" list? 176.93.61.49 (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I just noticed that this article is about a field of study instead of human communication. I was reading Wikipedia articles about dog and cat communication, and then the article Human, and these things together mislead me when entering this article. I won't edit it further. I guess the nature/definition of this article might be a controversial subject. Is there discussion somewhere in Wikipedia about these types of articles? About whether we should write Wikipedia for people or write more objectively, like having non-human readers in mind? Thanks. 176.93.61.49 (talk) 01:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)