Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Manchik: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:29, 9 August 2018

Joe Manchik

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. He's a morbid curiousity, so also WP:NOTNEWS. Including the Reason quote about shaming of third party voters appears to suggest this article pushing a POV. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete he's run in enough elections I can't support a redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2018. He's clearly not notable enough for a stand-alone article; the coverage consists of Ballotpedia (and similar directories of candidate), local [1] or trivial mentions, and news of the weird coverage. WP:NPOL is not met, and there's no coverage that's not about a campaign. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator. There is sufficient RS coverage to overcome. NPOL says "local political figures who have received significant press coverage", this guy merits this based on current citations, but certainly under GNG if not NPOL. I haven't even included in the article that he was the #1 trending Twitter topic on U.S. national election day. There is a serious and objective candidate platform analysis in Mansfield News Journal alongside the D and R candidates, for instance. Also, "morbid curiousity" or "news of the weird" are not policy based objections: we have FAs about weird things and people who claim all sorts of ancestries. Even a community-judged notable Pleiadian. And BTW this is international coverage now including The Independent, so scratch the argument that his notability is "merely local". ☆ Bri (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Trending topics on Twitter = WP:NOTNEWS. No WP:LASTING impact of this morbid curiosity. And "U.S. national election day" is the first Tuesday of November (unless that's Nov. 1, in which case election day is Nov. 8). This past Tuesday was a primary election day with contests in only four of the 50 states. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 * '''Delete''' he's run in enough elections I can't support a redirect to [[United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2018]].  He's clearly not notable enough for a stand-alone article; the coverage consists of Ballotpedia (and similar directories of candidate), local [http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180716/ohio-special-us-house-election-green-party-congressional-candidate-tries-to-make-noise---on-low-budget] or trivial mentions, and [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/08/green-party-spoiler-candidate-in-ohio-special-election-claims-to-be-descended-from-aliens.html news of the weird] coverage.  [[WP:NPOL]] is not met, and there's no coverage that's not about a campaign. [[User:power~enwiki|power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Power~enwiki|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 04:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * '''Keep''' as creator. There is sufficient RS coverage to overcome. NPOL says "local political figures who have received significant press coverage", this guy merits this based on current citations, but certainly under GNG if not NPOL. I haven't even included in the article that he was the [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ohio-special-election-pushes-green-party-into-twitters-trending-topics #1 trending Twitter topic] on U.S. national election day. There is a serious and objective candidate platform analysis in ''Mansfield News Journal'' alongside the D and R candidates, for instance. Also, "morbid curiousity" or "news of the weird" are not '''policy based objections''': we have FAs about [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo/archive1|weird things]] and people who claim all sorts of ancestries. Even a community-judged [[Ashtar (extraterrestrial being)|notable Pleiadian]]. And BTW this is international coverage now including [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ohio-election-joe-mantic-green-party-troy-balderson-danny-oconnor-a8483551.html ''The Independent''], so scratch the argument that his notability is "merely local". ☆ [[User:Bri|Bri]] ([[User talk:Bri|talk]]) 16:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
-**Trending topics on Twitter = [[WP:NOTNEWS]]. No [[WP:LASTING]] impact of this morbid curiosity. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
+**Trending topics on Twitter = [[WP:NOTNEWS]]. No [[WP:LASTING]] impact of this morbid curiosity. And "U.S. national election day" is the first Tuesday of November (unless that's Nov. 1, in which case election day is Nov. 8). This past Tuesday was a primary election day with contests in only four of the 50 states. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)