Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/KaDee Strickland/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
{{FARClosed|delisted}}
Line 21: Line 21:
:''Issues raised in the review section mostly centred on coverage. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 13:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)''
:''Issues raised in the review section mostly centred on coverage. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 13:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)''
*'''Delist'''. Article is unbalanced with career prior to 2007 described in detail and career afterwards not at all. [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 13:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delist'''. Article is unbalanced with career prior to 2007 described in detail and career afterwards not at all. [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 13:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:43, 10 August 2018

KaDee Strickland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Notified: Extraordinary Machine, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, WikiProject Women

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because it has not been updated to include information on Strickland's career since its promotion as a FAC. Information in the "Career" section ends around 2007, and one can see just from looking at the "Television" and "Film" tables in the "Filmography and performances" section, that there is a large gap of Strickland's career unaccounted for. As for more minor notes, reference 6 is also a dead link (a permanent dead link?) and I noticed that there are several instances of WP:SHOUTING in the reference titles.

I have left a message on the talk page and pinged @Extraordinary Machine: as this was the primary user during the FAC process. I think that a lot of wonderful work has gone into this article, but it requires so much updating that I feel that it no longer fulfills the criteria for a featured article. Aoba47 (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Extraordinary Machine hasn't edited since this past September, so I'm not sure that user will be around anytime soon to help improve the page. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @SNUGGUMS: I apologize if this question has an obvious answer, but I am assuming that this is left open to allow other users to comment and potentially improve/revise the article even though Extraordinary Machine is no longer active on Wikipedia? I am very unfamiliar with the FAR process so I am just uncertain about things work from this point. Aoba47 (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Chiming in from oblivion - I assumed this had been demoted already! As well as the article being out of date, I'd imagine standards/criteria for featured articles have rightly changed since this article got promoted (13 years ago... how time flies!). Unfortunately I have neither the time nor inclination to bring it back up to scratch, but don't let that stop anyone else! :) Extraordinary Machine (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the response! If I have more time in the future, I might try to expand on the article. Either way, I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far! Aoba47 (talk) 21:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section mostly centred on coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]