Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome 2.0: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
Much of the accusation levied against this article is based on personal opinion and standards; specifically, use of the word "preposterous," to describe the legitimacy of a student-run organization. [[User talk:Modernantiquehistory]]
Much of the accusation levied against this article is based on personal opinion and standards; specifically, use of the word "preposterous," to describe the legitimacy of a student-run organization. [[User talk:Modernantiquehistory]]


Again, despite the diminutive Facebook group, the fact that this organization has an entirely fan-run and unaffiliated (though they call themselves "official") Facebook group shows that Rome 2.0 has notoriety outside of its circle, to garner a steadily growing base of support. The student group behind Rome 2.0 are currently receiving attention from local reporters affiliated with the [[Harvard Crimson]] and the [[Register Forum]]. [[User talk:Modernantiguehistory]]
Again, despite the diminutive Facebook group, the fact that this organization has an entirely fan-run and unaffiliated (though they call themselves "official") Facebook group shows that Rome 2.0 has notoriety outside of its circle, to garner a steadily growing base of support. The student group behind Rome 2.0 are currently receiving attention from local reporters affiliated with the [[Harvard Crimson]] and the [[Register Forum]]. [[User talk:Modernantiquehistory]]





Revision as of 18:32, 14 August 2018

Rome 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY by coverage in third-party source; not even a website for this group is mentioned, hence possibly even WP:HOAX. Constantine 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC) this is a Facebook group without wider significance as yet. Constantine 11:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about a group of young linguistic scholars who live around the world, since their website is currently under construction, as is their kick starter campaign, the only remaining third party source is a Facebook page made by a fan. I have also added more sources discussing the subject of the evolution of the latin language to modern ecclesiastic latin, a subject that I feel is inadequately covered by this, or any other encyclopedia. I have also removed Rome 2.0 from the list of claimant nations or micro-nations, instead classifying it as a mainly academic phenomenon. Much of the accusation levied against this article is based on personal opinion and standards; specifically, use of the word "preposterous," to describe the legitimacy of a student-run organization. User talk:Modernantiquehistory

Again, despite the diminutive Facebook group, the fact that this organization has an entirely fan-run and unaffiliated (though they call themselves "official") Facebook group shows that Rome 2.0 has notoriety outside of its circle, to garner a steadily growing base of support. The student group behind Rome 2.0 are currently receiving attention from local reporters affiliated with the Harvard Crimson and the Register Forum. User talk:Modernantiquehistory


Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]