Jump to content

T-72 tanks in Iraqi service: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta5)
Line 59: Line 59:
The Lion of Babylon saw service in the 1991 Persian Gulf War as well as the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Like other tanks in the Iraqi inventory, Lions were mainly employed as armored [[self-propelled artillery]], rather than in [[maneuver warfare]] roles. In operations, it fared poorly against American [[main battle tank]]s and [[armored fighting vehicles]]. For example, a 120&nbsp;mm [[depleted uranium]] (DU) [[APFSDS]] round from an [[M1 Abrams]] could knock out a Lion of Babylon tank well beyond 3,000&nbsp;m,<ref>Scales, page 298: "The Iraqi plan was to kill the American tanks on the ridge with dug-in T-72s and then drive the survivors back into the wadi and finish them off with artillery. The Iraqis, however, had no idea they could be detected and destroyed at a range of nearly 2 miles."</ref> while the effective range of the [[tungsten]]-core 125&nbsp;mm shell used by Iraq was 1,800&nbsp;m.<ref name="Scales, page 261">Scales, page 261</ref>
The Lion of Babylon saw service in the 1991 Persian Gulf War as well as the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Like other tanks in the Iraqi inventory, Lions were mainly employed as armored [[self-propelled artillery]], rather than in [[maneuver warfare]] roles. In operations, it fared poorly against American [[main battle tank]]s and [[armored fighting vehicles]]. For example, a 120&nbsp;mm [[depleted uranium]] (DU) [[APFSDS]] round from an [[M1 Abrams]] could knock out a Lion of Babylon tank well beyond 3,000&nbsp;m,<ref>Scales, page 298: "The Iraqi plan was to kill the American tanks on the ridge with dug-in T-72s and then drive the survivors back into the wadi and finish them off with artillery. The Iraqis, however, had no idea they could be detected and destroyed at a range of nearly 2 miles."</ref> while the effective range of the [[tungsten]]-core 125&nbsp;mm shell used by Iraq was 1,800&nbsp;m.<ref name="Scales, page 261">Scales, page 261</ref>


Within closer ranges, the Lion of Babylon was more effective, especially while within prepared positions.<ref>Scales, page 269: "As TF 1-37th Armor crossed over the ridge into the heart of the Iraqi defensive zone, the Iraqi commander's carefully disposed rear-slope defense stripped Dyer's tanks of their range advantage. Within 1,000 meters, a row of dug-in T-72s and BMPs suddenly appeared below the crest. All were hull-down in prepared positions behind thick dirt walls. Now the Americans were well within Iraqi killing range, and although the Soviet-made night sights were markedly inferior, things could still get very dicey."</ref> However, even in such conditions, the Lion of Babylon did not fare well against M1s—as proven in the [[Battle of Norfolk]] during [[Desert Storm]],<ref>Scales, page 270: "After the war they (TF 1-37th) returned to count the burned-out hulks of 76 T-72s, 84 BMPs, 3 air defense artillery pieces, 8 howitzers, 6 command vehicles, 2 engineer vehicles, and myriad of trucks."</ref> although the tank also participated in the [[battle of Phase Line Bullet]], where [[M2 Bradley|Bradleys]] IFVs from the 4th squadron of the [[US 7th Cavalry Regiment|7th Cavalry Regiment]] were driven back by dug-in Iraqi armoured vehicles at heavy cost.<ref name=":0">Atkinson, pp. 428-433</ref>
Within closer ranges, the Lion of Babylon was more effective, especially while within prepared positions.<ref>Scales, page 269: "As TF 1-37th Armor crossed over the ridge into the heart of the Iraqi defensive zone, the Iraqi commander's carefully disposed rear-slope defense stripped Dyer's tanks of their range advantage. Within 1,000 meters, a row of dug-in T-72s and BMPs suddenly appeared below the crest. All were hull-down in prepared positions behind thick dirt walls. Now the Americans were well within Iraqi killing range, and although the Soviet-made night sights were markedly inferior, things could still get very dicey."</ref> However, even in such conditions, the Lion of Babylon did not fare well against M1s—as proven in the [[Battle of Norfolk]] during [[Desert Storm]],<ref>Scales, page 270: "After the war they (TF 1-37th) returned to count the burned-out hulks of 76 T-72s, 84 BMPs, 3 air defense artillery pieces, 8 howitzers, 6 command vehicles, 2 engineer vehicles, and myriad of trucks."</ref> although the tank also participated in the [[Battle of Phase Line Bullet]], where [[M2 Bradley|Bradleys]] IFVs from the 4th squadron of the [[US 7th Cavalry Regiment|7th Cavalry Regiment]] were driven back by dug-in Iraqi armoured vehicles at heavy cost.<ref name=":0">Atkinson, pp. 428-433</ref>


===Persian Gulf War===
===Persian Gulf War===

Revision as of 11:05, 15 August 2018

"Lion of Babylon"
A captured Iraqi T-72 on display at Fort Hood
TypeMain battle tank
Service history
WarsPersian Gulf War, Iraq War
Production history
DesignerKartsev-Venediktov
Produced1989–1990
No. builtDisputed, few completed besides prototypes[1]
100 (Russian claims)[2]
None finished (Polish claims)[3]
Specifications
Mass41.5 tonnes (45.7 short tons)
Length9.53 m (31 ft 3 in) gun forward
6.95 m (22 ft 10 in) hull
Width3.59 m (11 ft 9 in)
Height2.23 m (7 ft 4 in)
Crew3
ArmorMild steel,[citation needed] 45-300mm[citation needed]
Main
armament
125 mm 2A46M
Secondary
armament
  • 7.62 mm PKT coax machine gun
  • 12.7 mm NSVT antiaircraft machine gun or
    12.7 mm DShK AA machine gun
EngineV-12 diesel
780 hp (582 kw)
Power/weight18.8 hp/t
SuspensionTorsion bar
Some dampers removed to suit desert conditions[citation needed]
Operational
range
425 km
600 km with fuel barrels
Maximum speed 60 km/h (road)
45 km/h (off-road)

Lion of Babylon or Asad Babil (Arabic: اسد بابل) is the name given to a project of the Ba'athist Iraqi army to locally produce the Soviet T-72 tank during the late-1980s. The tanks were to be assembled at a factory near Taji, Iraq.[3][4] This project represented an attempt by Saddam Hussein's regime to locally manufacture tanks, triggered in part by the Western embargo against the sale of military vehicles to Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War. However it is disputed if any tanks have ever been finished.

The Lion of Babylon tank draws its name from the Lion of Babylon, an ancient Babylonian symbol representing ruling power. The name is sometimes incorrectly used to refer to T-72s in Iraqi service, which were imported from the Soviet Union and Poland.

Production history

In 1986 a West German company built a factory in Taji to manufacture steel for several military uses. It was enlisted to retrofit and rebuild tanks already on duty in the Iraqi Army, such as T-54/55s, T-62s, and several hundred of Soviet and Polish T-72s,[5] imported during early stages of the war with Iran.[2] In the late-1980s plans were made to produce new T-72M1 tanks in Taji. These tanks were to be assembled from knockdown kits delivered by the Polish state-owned company Bumar-Łabędy.[6] The assembly was to start in 1989 and the tanks would receive the name Asad Babil (Lion of Babylon). According to Polish officials not a single T-72M1 was finished, even though in 1988 a T-72M was displayed on an Iraqi arms show, which was claimed to be locally produced.[6] The local assembly of the T-72 started in Taji in early 1989 as suggested by Iraqi officials.[5] A number of Iraqi officials such as Lt. General Amer Rashid however did not like the idea of being dependent on knockdown kits supplied by another country and pushed for the complete production of the T-72M1 tank instead.[5][6] In 1991 the Taji plant was destroyed by an airstrike while being upgraded by Bumar-Łabędy.[6]

The United Nations imposed an arms embargo following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, which reduced the complete assembly of tanks to simple spare parts for Lions and other tanks in the Iraqi arsenal.[5] It is not known how many Lion tanks were completed during the span between early 1989 and this embargo.

Specifications

In most aspects, the Lion of Babylon is physically identical to the T-72M1 it is based on.[7] Lion of Babylon T-72s were upgraded with the addition of laminated armor on the front slope and rear panels as protection against HEAT projectiles.[4] American military intelligence believed some were equipped with Belgian-made thermal sights.[8] These same sources claim the tank was also provided with a better track protection against sand and mud than the Soviet T-72, by reducing the original number of shock absorbers.[9][10] Some tanks also were fitted with a type of electro-optical interference pod of Chinese origin.[11][12] As secondary armament, the tank mounted either the NSV or the DShK 12.7 mm machine gun and the coaxial 7.62 mm PKT common to all T-72 models.

Armor

Image showing the plate of laminated armor welded on the glacis of a T-72. Note the edges around the rectangular section of the towing eyes and driver's hatch.

The Lion's primary armor was the same as the T-72M1, without any improvements. The Lion's side armor had 60 mm protection,[citation needed] the turret side armor was 300 mm,[citation needed] and the flat rear was 45 mm thick.[13][verification needed][better source needed]

Despite the relative thinness, a retrofitted reinforced armor plate present both at the turret and the front upper hull seems to have been relatively effective against some shaped-charge ordnance, like the TOWs and Hellfire missiles. There are reports of Iraqi T-72s surviving near-misses from these weapons, although the reinforced armor generally did not prevent a mobility kill. However, it is also possible that the unexpected survival rate was due to the electro-optical countermeasures mounted on most of the tanks rather than the added armor.[14][15][16][17]

There is evidence of at least one Lion[citation needed] surviving a direct hit from an Abrams main gun in Mahmoudiyah in 2003. A 120 mm HEAT round from an Abrams impacted on the front of an Asad Babil turret[verification needed] at point blank range without producing a catastrophic kill.[18] Some Lion tanks may have featured explosive reactive armor, possibly obtained from Polish T-72M1 spare parts.[19]

Another improvised armor upgrade may have also been added at the Taji complex.[2] An additional 30 mm armor plate was welded on the front areas of the hull and turret, leaving an air gap matching the size of the armor, so that the power of a HEAT jet could be dissipated in the hollow space. This technique follows the principle of spaced armor. The Iraqi engineers tested this reinforcement against captured Iranian 120 mm Chieftain tank guns in 1989, apparently with some success.[20]

Combat performance

The Lion of Babylon saw service in the 1991 Persian Gulf War as well as the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Like other tanks in the Iraqi inventory, Lions were mainly employed as armored self-propelled artillery, rather than in maneuver warfare roles. In operations, it fared poorly against American main battle tanks and armored fighting vehicles. For example, a 120 mm depleted uranium (DU) APFSDS round from an M1 Abrams could knock out a Lion of Babylon tank well beyond 3,000 m,[21] while the effective range of the tungsten-core 125 mm shell used by Iraq was 1,800 m.[22]

Within closer ranges, the Lion of Babylon was more effective, especially while within prepared positions.[23] However, even in such conditions, the Lion of Babylon did not fare well against M1s—as proven in the Battle of Norfolk during Desert Storm,[24] although the tank also participated in the Battle of Phase Line Bullet, where Bradleys IFVs from the 4th squadron of the 7th Cavalry Regiment were driven back by dug-in Iraqi armoured vehicles at heavy cost.[25]

Persian Gulf War

The bulk of Iraqi armoured units were equipped with the Type 69 and only Republican Guard divisions were equipped with Iraqi-modified T-72s, with exception of the regular army's armored Saladin division.[26] Thus, engagements between Lions of Babylon and American tanks were limited to conflicts involving such Iraqi units.

During Desert Storm, T-72s built in Taji were technologically 20 years out of date. Only one M1 Abrams was officially documented during the Persian Gulf War as having received enough damage to be towed and receive maintenance after being struck three times on the turret by a Lion.[27] Another six M1A1s were allegedly hit by Iraqi T-72 tank fire in the Gulf War official report, but the impacts were largely ineffectual.[28] According to Atkinson and Scales, Lions accounted for at least two M2 Bradley kills during Desert Storm and left several damaged, all on February 26, 1991.[25][29]

2003 Iraq War

A Lion tank abandoned after the U.S. attack into Baghdad.

During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Republican Guard's Lions, most from the Medina Division, were deployed around Baghdad to attempt a last-ditch defense of the Baath regime.[30]

In April 2003, U.S. tanks engaged their counterparts from just 50 yards, killing seven Iraqi T-72s without any losses.[31] Such encounters exposed the poor marksmanship of Iraqi gunners, in part due to the shortage of modern night-vision and range-finder assets.[32] The Lions were even more technologically lacking at this time, and it is not known if any improvements to the tanks were made between the Persian Gulf War and this conflict. Nonetheless, one Bradley was largely disabled by a 125 mm round from an Asad Babil tank when Iraqi armoured troops attempted to attack their American counterparts near Baghdad airport.[33]

Fate

The last operational Lions were destroyed by the successive waves of American armored incursions on the Iraqi capital[34] or abandoned by their crews after the fall of Baghdad, several of them without firing a single shot. The derelict tanks were later scrapped by U.S. Army disposal teams or shipped to the United States for target practice.

Two years after the fall of Saddam Hussein, the new Iraqi Government acquired dozens of refitted T-72M1s from Hungary, in order to equip an armored brigade. The headquarters of this new Iraqi Army unit is located in Taji, so there may still remain some maintenance facilities from the production of Lions. Some surviving T-72s are used for training, and the experience of Iraqi Army officers and crews with the Lion was one of the reasons behind the choice of Hungarian T-72M1s.[35]

Notes

  1. ^ Steven J. Zaloga & Peter Sarson (1993), p. 38
  2. ^ a b c ТАНКИ ИРАКСКОЙ АРМИИ [Iraqi Army Tanks]. otvaga2004.narod.ru (in Russian). December 29, 2009.
  3. ^ a b Steven J. Zaloga & Peter Sarson (1993), p. 24
  4. ^ a b "Baath Ground Forces Equipment", globalsecurity.org, The Russian T-72M1 Main Battle Tank (MBT) was modified with additional armor in the front and rear to protect against HEAT projectiles. This "Lion of Babylon" tank was produced locally, and the technology was Iraqi. However, the soviets made all the parts and it was assembled in Iraq.
  5. ^ a b c d Timmerman, Kenneth R, "Chapter 16: The Gang's All Here", The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq, ISBN 978-0-395-59305-9
  6. ^ a b c d Zaloga, Steven J. (2009). M1 Abrams Vs T-72 Ural - Operation Desert Storm 1991. Osprey Publishing Ltd. p. 24. ISBN 978 1 84603 432 9.
  7. ^ Zaloga & Sarson (1993) p. 38
  8. ^ Atkinson, p.443
  9. ^ John Pike. "GlobalSecurity.org". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2013-02-03.
  10. ^ JED website (available by free subscription)[self-published source?]
  11. ^ Zaloga & Sarson, T-72... p.22
  12. ^ "T72 Tank". fas.org. Federation of American Scientists. Image showing the cylindrical interference pod on top of the tank turret {{cite web}}: External link in |quote= (help)
  13. ^ Data retrieved from Isby, Weapons and tactics...
  14. ^ Gollaher, Capt. Michael (May–June 1991), "Two Scouts Under Fire Helped Injured Buddies During Night Battle" (PDF), Armor magazine, p. 21[permanent dead link‍]
  15. ^ Atkinson, p. 444, cites another case of a TOW bouncing off a T-72 and hitting the turret of another tank
  16. ^ Brig. Gen. Scales hints that some Iraqi T-72s survived Hellfire strikes before the 1-37TF assault (p.268).
  17. ^ Dispatches From Iraq; "To ensure complete catastrophic destruction of the second tank, Private First Class Davis fired a second Javelin, causing even more explosions on the second tank. At this point the third T-72 began frantically trying to determine the source and direction of incoming fire. Private First Class Jiminez engaged the now moving third tank. His round missed but impacted close enough to damage the tank."
  18. ^ Conroy & Martz, p. 9
  19. ^ Baumgardner, Neil; 654 words. "Infantry magazine, September 1, 2004". Highbeam.com. Retrieved 2013-02-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ "ТАНКИ ИРАКСКОЙ АРМИИ" [Iraqi Army Tanks]. otvaga2004.narod.ru (in Russian). December 29, 2009. В 1988-89 гг. эти танки прошли модернизацию по усилению защищенности верхних лобовых деталей корпуса танка. Это достигалось путем приварки дополнительного броневого листа толщиной 30 мм с воздушной прослойкой, такого же размера. Эта мера была предпринята иракцами после изучения возможностей защиты танков от поражения различными боеприпасами 120-мм английской нарезной танковой пушки L 11А5, установленной на иранских танках "Чифтен", захваченных Ираком в ходе войны.
    "In 1988-89. These tanks had been upgraded to enhance the protection of the upper front of the tank hull. This was achieved by welding additional 30 mm armored plating with stand-offs producing an air gap of the same size. This measure was taken by the Iraqis after experimenting with protecting tanks from defeat by various 120 mm ammunition from the British L11A5 rifled tank gun installed on Iran's Chieftain tanks, seized by Iraq during the war.
  21. ^ Scales, page 298: "The Iraqi plan was to kill the American tanks on the ridge with dug-in T-72s and then drive the survivors back into the wadi and finish them off with artillery. The Iraqis, however, had no idea they could be detected and destroyed at a range of nearly 2 miles."
  22. ^ Scales, page 261
  23. ^ Scales, page 269: "As TF 1-37th Armor crossed over the ridge into the heart of the Iraqi defensive zone, the Iraqi commander's carefully disposed rear-slope defense stripped Dyer's tanks of their range advantage. Within 1,000 meters, a row of dug-in T-72s and BMPs suddenly appeared below the crest. All were hull-down in prepared positions behind thick dirt walls. Now the Americans were well within Iraqi killing range, and although the Soviet-made night sights were markedly inferior, things could still get very dicey."
  24. ^ Scales, page 270: "After the war they (TF 1-37th) returned to count the burned-out hulks of 76 T-72s, 84 BMPs, 3 air defense artillery pieces, 8 howitzers, 6 command vehicles, 2 engineer vehicles, and myriad of trucks."
  25. ^ a b Atkinson, pp. 428-433
  26. ^ Zaloga & Sarson, T-72... p.38
  27. ^ AMCCT test
  28. ^ Fahey, Dan: Collateral Damage...During the ground war, only seven M1A1's were hit by rounds fired from the Iraqi's T-72 tanks, with none being seriously damaged. See also: George F. Hofmann & Donn A. Starry, pag.9
  29. ^ Scales, p. 273
  30. ^ Zucchino, page 3
  31. ^ Conroy & Mars, p. 158
  32. ^ Scales, page 268: "The Iraqi gunners were poor marksmen and their green tracer sabots hit nothing."
  33. ^ Fontenot, Degen and Thon, p. 306
  34. ^ John Pike (2003-04-05). "GlobalSecurity.org". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2013-02-03.
  35. ^ Jewell, Sgt. Lorie (November 2005). "Iraqi Army Takes Delivery of Tanks, Vehicles". defendamerica.mil. Multinational Security Transition Command-Iraq. Archived from the original on 2006-08-02. Retrieved 2006-08-03. Many of the division's soldiers drove T-72 tanks in the old Iraqi Army, so they are familiar with operating and maintaining them, leaders said. A handful of the tanks remain at Taji and are used for training purposes. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

References

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Asad Babil tanks.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=T-72_tanks_in_Iraqi_service&oldid=855019501"