Jump to content

Talk:Game theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ping added.
Line 102: Line 102:
== ''(Non-)determinstic'': in terminology? ==
== ''(Non-)determinstic'': in terminology? ==


I hesitate to add this, as I am not familiar with the usual terminology, but surely there is an important distinction, worth adding under ''[[Game_theory#Game_types|Game types]]'', between games whose course is entirely determined by the decisions of the players and those influenced by an element of chance. (This is of course not the same as [[Determinacy]] or a [[determined game]].) If added, it would also belong in [[Glossary of game theory]]. [[User:PJTraill|PJTraill]] ([[User talk:PJTraill|talk]]) 14:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I hesitate to add this, as I am not familiar with the usual terminology, but surely there is an important distinction, worth adding under ''[[Game_theory#Game_types|Game types]]'', between games whose course is entirely determined by the decisions of the players and those influenced by an element of chance. (This is of course not the same as [[Determinacy]] or a [[determined game]].) If added, it would also belong in [[Glossary of game theory]]. ''{{ping|David Eppstein}} since you just edited the article!'' [[User:PJTraill|PJTraill]] ([[User talk:PJTraill|talk]]) 14:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:28, 18 August 2018

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleGame theory is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 13, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
March 18, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Quantum game theory

Unless I'm looking the wrong place, the quantum game theory page is a bit bare (to say the least) but in any case, does anyone agree that it would be interesting if added here? QGT is one of the more interesting and accessible topics in quantum theory.- 26/10/06 Paul

"Perfect information and imperfect information" section

This seems to mix everything up. I'd suggest a rewrite like this, but I don't feel qualified to change it.


Perfect information and imperfect information Main article: Perfect information

An important subset of sequential games consists of games of perfect information. A game is one of perfect information if all players know the moves previously made by all other players. Thus, only sequential games can be games of perfect information because players in simultaneous games do not know the actions of the other players. Interesting examples of perfect-information games include the ultimatum game and centipede game. Recreational games of perfect information games include chess, go and mancala.

Perfect information is often confused with complete information, which is a similar concept. See: (provide a link to one place where notion is discussed well...)

Most games studied in game theory are imperfect-information games. Many card games are games of imperfect information, such as poker or contract bridge. Games of incomplete information can be reduced, however, to games of imperfect information by introducing "moves by nature" (Leyton-Brown & Shoham

Removal of cites

This edit claims to have removed EconLib links, but it has removed other sources too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&type=revision&diff=774503535&oldid=774205565

Not sure if all are valid removals. Jonpatterns (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Game theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Economics Sidebar

I think that the economics sidebar should be removed, since Game Theory doesn't seem to be primarily concerned with Economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Get Learnt (talkcontribs) 05:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would be in agreement with you, there are much more approproate imagges. Fro exampel a symbolic depiction of the a network or the proziners Dilema.

I first met Game Theory in Apllied Mathematics II - Dynamic Programming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipdc (talkcontribs) 12:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-)determinstic: in terminology?

I hesitate to add this, as I am not familiar with the usual terminology, but surely there is an important distinction, worth adding under Game types, between games whose course is entirely determined by the decisions of the players and those influenced by an element of chance. (This is of course not the same as Determinacy or a determined game.) If added, it would also belong in Glossary of game theory. @David Eppstein: since you just edited the article! PJTraill (talk) 14:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]