Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinking (album): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep''': I was surprised that this album didn't chart, given that it contains the group's two biggest hit singles, but the Aloof were a reasonably well known group on the mid-90s dance scene in the UK, and this album was their high point – the two hit singles had a fair bit of airplay on [[BBC Radio 1]]'s specialist music programmes. I was confident that I would find reviews of this album, given that the group wasn't unknown, and I've added reviews from ''Melody Maker'', ''NME'' and ''Q'', plus an interview with them from ''Muzik'' magazine. I think this should be enough to pass [[WP:NALBUM]] as a stub article, and I would think there is probably more out there in the specialist music magazines of the time such as ''Mixmag'' and ''DJ Mag'', which are not available online. In light of the information I have added, I don't know whether {{u|Hzh}} would like to reassess his/her vote. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 21:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': I was surprised that this album didn't chart, given that it contains the group's two biggest hit singles, but the Aloof were a reasonably well known group on the mid-90s dance scene in the UK, and this album was their high point – the two hit singles had a fair bit of airplay on [[BBC Radio 1]]'s specialist music programmes. I was confident that I would find reviews of this album, given that the group wasn't unknown, and I've added reviews from ''Melody Maker'', ''NME'' and ''Q'', plus an interview with them from ''Muzik'' magazine. I think this should be enough to pass [[WP:NALBUM]] as a stub article, and I would think there is probably more out there in the specialist music magazines of the time such as ''Mixmag'' and ''DJ Mag'', which are not available online. In light of the information I have added, I don't know whether {{u|Hzh}} would like to reassess his/her vote. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 21:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
:: Good work finding the reviews. I would discount the AllMusic one as it is too short (I had already seen it before), as I can't check the others, if they are full reviews, then I'd be happy to change my vote. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 22:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
:: Good work finding the reviews. I would discount the AllMusic one as it is too short (I had already seen it before), as I can't check the others, if they are full reviews, then I'd be happy to change my vote. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 22:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - The album may not have sold loads of copies at the time but as mentioned the band were part of the UK dance scene and the album was critically acclaimed. Not everyone wants to read about ''Thriller'' or ''Sgt. Pepper''! The recent additions have brought the article to a higher standard. --[[User:Geach|Geach]] ([[User talk:Geach|talk]]) 22:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:20, 20 August 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sinking (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album that never reached the top 100, passes no notability guidelines. Redditaddict69 10:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability for the album found in search. The UK album chart normally only gives Top 100 anyway, so charting over 100 is not considered significant. Fails WP:NALBUMS. Hzh (talk) 11:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I was surprised that this album didn't chart, given that it contains the group's two biggest hit singles, but the Aloof were a reasonably well known group on the mid-90s dance scene in the UK, and this album was their high point – the two hit singles had a fair bit of airplay on BBC Radio 1's specialist music programmes. I was confident that I would find reviews of this album, given that the group wasn't unknown, and I've added reviews from Melody Maker, NME and Q, plus an interview with them from Muzik magazine. I think this should be enough to pass WP:NALBUM as a stub article, and I would think there is probably more out there in the specialist music magazines of the time such as Mixmag and DJ Mag, which are not available online. In light of the information I have added, I don't know whether Hzh would like to reassess his/her vote. Richard3120 (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Good work finding the reviews. I would discount the AllMusic one as it is too short (I had already seen it before), as I can't check the others, if they are full reviews, then I'd be happy to change my vote. Hzh (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - The album may not have sold loads of copies at the time but as mentioned the band were part of the UK dance scene and the album was critically acclaimed. Not everyone wants to read about Thriller or Sgt. Pepper! The recent additions have brought the article to a higher standard. --Geach (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC)