Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1347 in philosophy

1347 in philosophy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

1347 in philosophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG failing list with 1 entry. » Shadowowl | talk 16:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

• Comment @Shadowowl: I think you could perhaps try to combine all these "Year in philosophy" lists with only one entry into larger lists, i.e. something like combining 1007 in philosophy, 1073 in philosophy, and 1079 in philosophy into 11th century in philosophy or a similar title? ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 16:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

• That might be a good idea. The point is that some user created these pages for random years, and that you might have to search a lot for the others who were not born in the years randomly picked by some user. » Shadowowl | talk 16:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

• Deletion would violate WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE and WP:R because we could merge and redirect to Medieval philosophy. Alternatively we could apply WP:POKEMON and combine these year articles into century articles: the centuries in philosophy will be notable due to things like this. No comment on notability at this time. James500 (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)