Talk:Cornell Law School: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:41, 21 August 2018

New York (state): Cornell University Start‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornell University, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Law C‑class Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revision

how does this page look —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cornell010 (talk • contribs)

Don't copy text from a source, that is plagiarism. Use multiple sources to write an article.
Always log in if you have an account.
Always sign your comments. -mercuryboard^talk ♠ 18:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But, you have to admit the library section really blows.--Cornell010 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but you can't plagiarize. The library section should be expanded... just go through the source and rewrite the section (from scratch) around it. -mercuryboard^talk ♠ 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering, if we cited the source, then would it still be plagiarism? I am asking this because, on some other wikipedia pages I have seen people copy from another source word for word, however, they cited it, and by citing it wouldn't we be recognizing the source, thus not commmitting plagiarism. Thanks.User:Cornell010 20:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then you're mirroring content which has not been released under a Wikipedia-friendly license and you're not plagiarizing, but instead blatantly infringing on a copyright. -mercuryboard^talk ♠ 20:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see.--Cornell010 20:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I just re-wrote the Library section, however, I need help with using the same refernce more than once (citing it). I tried to learn from the main Cornell article, where this is done many times, however, I could not get it to work. User:Cornell010 17:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First instance of the reference: <ref name='something'>{{cite whatever}}</ref>

All instances after the first: <ref name='something' />

The somethings have to be the same. -mercuryboard^talk ♠ 21:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admissions numbers

There seems to be a problem with the admissions percentages, as the 583 number is the TOTAL number of J.D. students at Cornell. CLS class cohorts are typically 180-200 students in size. So, the applicants compete to be one of the roughly 180-200 students entering in a particular year, not one of 500-600. I'll wait to hear some debate on this, but I will change the numbers soon. Masonpatriot 18:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the editor also combined yield and acceptance into one mostly useless statistic. —mercuryboard^talk 18:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The introduction of this article is in desperate need of citations. I know that many of these pages are written/edited by students/alums/administration, but the introduction reads like an advertisement, with nothing to back up many of the boasts. Rms869 (talk) 08:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Needs WP:MOS work to get to B class. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by tagging

Lots of WP:BOOSTERISM. —Notyourbroom (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable faculty

This section was padded out with several people who lacked a Wikipedia article to back the assertion of notability. Please see this edit for the specific list of names I removed. Note that I am not asserting that these people are non-notable. In the absence of corroboration within Wikipedia, however, I am erring on the side of a purge of the section, as is standard practice in these cases. —Bill Price^{(notyourbroom)} 00:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cornell Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130615185120/http://cornellsun.com/node/49072 to http://cornellsun.com/node/49072

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The JD/Master en Droit lasts four-years and prepares graduates for admission to the bar in the United States and in France. The JD/M.LL.P is three years and conveys a mastery of German and European law and practices. The JD/Master in Global Business Law lasts three years. Needs a citation to prove that the JD/Masters program actually offers undergraduates this opportunity.