Jump to content

Called to Common Mission: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
missing initialism defs
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{primary sources|date=June 2009}}
{{primary sources|date=June 2009}}
'''Called to Common Mission''' is an agreement between [[Episcopal Church in the United States of America|The Episcopal Church]] and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]] (ELCA) in the [[United States]], establishing full communion between them. It was ratified by the ELCA in 1999, the ECUSA in 2000, after the narrow failure of a previous agreement. Its principal author on the Episcopal side was theological professor [[J. Robert Wright]]. Under the agreement, they recognize the validity of each other's [[baptism]]s and [[ordination]]s. The agreement provided that the ELCA would accept the [[historical episcopate]] and the "threefold ministry" of [[Bishop]] - [[Priest]] (or [[Pastor]]) - [[Deacon]], something which became controversial in the ELCA, which previously after its creating merger in 1988, held a lengthy study of the ministry which was undertaken with divided opinions. In response to concerns about the meaning of the CCM, synod bishops in the ELCA drafted a subsequent [http://wordalone.org/docs/wa-tucson-resolution.shtml Tucson Resolution], which presented the official ELCA position.
'''Called to Common Mission''' (CCM) is an agreement between [[Episcopal Church in the United States of America|The Episcopal Church]] (ECUSA) and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]] (ELCA) in the [[United States]], establishing full communion between them. It was ratified by the ELCA in 1999, the ECUSA in 2000, after the narrow failure of a previous agreement. Its principal author on the Episcopal side was theological professor [[J. Robert Wright]]. Under the agreement, they recognize the validity of each other's [[baptism]]s and [[ordination]]s. The agreement provided that the ELCA would accept the [[historical episcopate]] and the "threefold ministry" of [[Bishop]] - [[Priest]] (or [[Pastor]]) - [[Deacon]]. This provision was opposed by a minority in the ELCA, which after its founding merger in 1988, held a lengthy study of the ministry which was undertaken with divided opinions.{{cn|date=August 2018}} In response to concerns about the meaning of the CCM, synod bishops in the ELCA drafted a subsequent [http://wordalone.org/docs/wa-tucson-resolution.shtml Tucson Resolution], which presented the official ELCA position.


Some within the ELCA argued that requiring the historic episcopate would contradict the traditional [[Lutheran doctrine]] that the church exists wherever the Word is preached and Sacraments are practiced. Others objected on the grounds that adopting the Episcopal / Anglican view on priestly orders and hierarchical structure was contrary to the [[Lutheranism|Evangelical Lutheran]] concept of the "[[priesthood of all believers]]", which holds that all Christians stand on equal footing before God. They argued that the [[Old Covenant]] required a priest to mediate between God and humanity, but that [[New Covenant]] explicitly abolishes the need for priestly role by making every Christian a priest with direct access to God's grace. Still others objected because of the implied directive that the use of a [[lay presidency]] would be abolished. This was a particularly issue for rural congregations that periodically "called" a congregation member to conduct communion services consecrating the elements (of bread and wine for service) in the interim period or with the absence of ordained clergy (pastor).
Some within the ELCA argued that the historical episcopate would contradict the traditional [[Lutheran doctrine]] that the church exists wherever the Word is preached and Sacraments are practiced. Others objected on the grounds that adopting the Episcopal / Anglican view on priestly orders and hierarchical structure was contrary to the [[Lutheranism|Evangelical Lutheran]] concept of the "[[priesthood of all believers]]", which holds that all Christians stand on equal footing before God. They argued that the [[Old Covenant]] required a priest to mediate between God and humanity, but that [[New Covenant]] explicitly abolishes the need for priestly role by making every Christian a priest with direct access to God's grace. Still others objected because of the implied directive that the use of a [[lay presidency]] would be abolished. This was a particularly issue for rural congregations that periodically "called" a congregation member to conduct communion services consecrating the elements (of bread and wine for service) in the interim period or with the absence of ordained clergy (pastor).{{cn|date=August 2018}}


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 16:34, 28 August 2018

Called to Common Mission (CCM) is an agreement between The Episcopal Church (ECUSA) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) in the United States, establishing full communion between them. It was ratified by the ELCA in 1999, the ECUSA in 2000, after the narrow failure of a previous agreement. Its principal author on the Episcopal side was theological professor J. Robert Wright. Under the agreement, they recognize the validity of each other's baptisms and ordinations. The agreement provided that the ELCA would accept the historical episcopate and the "threefold ministry" of Bishop - Priest (or Pastor) - Deacon. This provision was opposed by a minority in the ELCA, which after its founding merger in 1988, held a lengthy study of the ministry which was undertaken with divided opinions.[citation needed] In response to concerns about the meaning of the CCM, synod bishops in the ELCA drafted a subsequent Tucson Resolution, which presented the official ELCA position.

Some within the ELCA argued that the historical episcopate would contradict the traditional Lutheran doctrine that the church exists wherever the Word is preached and Sacraments are practiced. Others objected on the grounds that adopting the Episcopal / Anglican view on priestly orders and hierarchical structure was contrary to the Evangelical Lutheran concept of the "priesthood of all believers", which holds that all Christians stand on equal footing before God. They argued that the Old Covenant required a priest to mediate between God and humanity, but that New Covenant explicitly abolishes the need for priestly role by making every Christian a priest with direct access to God's grace. Still others objected because of the implied directive that the use of a lay presidency would be abolished. This was a particularly issue for rural congregations that periodically "called" a congregation member to conduct communion services consecrating the elements (of bread and wine for service) in the interim period or with the absence of ordained clergy (pastor).[citation needed]

See also