Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 371: Line 371:


[[User:Summerintx|Summerintx]] ([[User talk:Summerintx|talk]]) 04:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
[[User:Summerintx|Summerintx]] ([[User talk:Summerintx|talk]]) 04:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

== 05:47:30, 14 September 2018 review of draft by MerlijnTurn18 ==
{{Lafc|username=MerlijnTurn18|ts=05:47:30, 14 September 2018|draft=Draft:Gloria_Benedikt}}


I have re-submitted a text after theroadislong placed comments. I believe it complies with the rules of wikipedia now.
But this has been a while ago when I resubmitted it, and it still hasn't been published yet. Please give me clear instructions on what to do next in order to have it published a.s.a.p. Many thanks, kind regards

[[User:MerlijnTurn18|MerlijnTurn18]] ([[User talk:MerlijnTurn18|talk]]) 05:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:47, 14 September 2018

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 8

08:46:49, 8 September 2018 review of draft by JohnK3142


Background

Wanting to produce an article on Babylon.js I found that this draft page with the title [| BabylonJS] is still open for editing and a previous a draft with title Babylon.js [draft article] was deleted. To ensure my article is substantially different to and meets the Wikipedia criteria I have asked RHaworth for a copy of the deleted Babylon.js article.

Question

Regarding the titles BabylonJS and Babylon.js which of the following is the better option

1. Edit BabylonJS and redirect Babylon.js to it

2. Submit a new page Babylon.js, have the BabylonJS page deleted and redirect BabylonJS to Babylon.js

No longer relevant have decided on 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnK3142 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JohnK3142 (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

13:44:55, 8 September 2018 review of draft by Anonymous1941


Can somebody please take a look at my draft because I resubmitted the draft and with the help of Primefac I was able to fix all the issues with my draft. I have resubmitted the draft and it has been more than two weeks and no one has took a look at my draft. I would really appreciate it if someone reviews my draft.--Anonymous1941 (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous1941 (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anonymous1941. Someone will review it. The backlog of drafts awaiting review is 2 months going on 3 months, so don't expect anything to happen until November or thereabouts. While you wait, feel free to chip in at Wikipedia:Community portal to reduce some of the encyclopedia's many backlogs. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:40:10, 8 September 2018 review of draft by Srajprosadm


Trying to find out how much longer it is going to take to approve the Praana: article. Thanks much!

Srajprosadm (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srajprosadm 574 drafts have been waiting longer to be reviewed. It has been waiting 7 weeks. The backlog is running between 2 and 3 months. So I would guess it will be a few more weeks before the next review. Of course there's no guarantee that the next review will result in acceptance. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 9

01:59:35, 9 September 2018 review of submission by Christianadrias


Christianadrias (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:27:59, 9 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Abb14c


I wrote an article for publication. After review it was not accepted because it sounded like a poem. However, I cleared the text in the editing box and wrote a new one which I published.I haven't received any information yet. Again I still see the message that was left by the reviewer whenever I open my sandbox

Abb14c (talk) 06:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abb14c The article above seems to have been deleted, as you have requested it to be. I cannot see the page, so I can't offer help Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:12:28, 9 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Fazlam


I'm trying to make an initial page for the ethnic Pahari people who live in the western part of the jammu kashmir region but i'm being told a page is already made but that page refers to the pahari people of nepal who live east of the jammu kashmir region.

Fazlam (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fazlam - There isn't enough information here to warrant a new page specifically for it. If you can gain sourced information for this, then add it to Pahari people. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:42:22, 9 September 2018 review of draft by Vellino


Hi - I was hoping someone might be able to review my submission. I submitted my second version 8 weeks ago.

Many thanks - André

Vellino (talk) 22:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vellino Reviewed and declined. See comments on the panel atop of the draft page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:55:31, 9 September 2018 review of draft by UnrealAir


When I attempt to change the link to the channel on the infobox, it always ahows a link to some banned youtube channel and the channel parameter always reads P. Michael P. Link I want it to go to: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3q7lahh4WXoco8h-JTMATA P.S. I just repurposed PewDiePie's infobox. --UnrealAir (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC) UnrealAir (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UnrealAir - I have fixed this particular link. However, you should ask the question - is the subject notable for a wikipedia page? Please see the general notability guidelines, and see if the subject meets these. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 10

Request on 01:21:05, 10 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 137.119.141.90



137.119.141.90 (talk) 01:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

03:49:18, 10 September 2018 review of draft by Sharath RK Teja


Sharath RK Teja (talk) 03:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point out the parts of the article that sounds promotional, so that I can improve it?

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Sharath RK Teja#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your declaration, Sharath RK Teja. I see that Draft:Grptalk has been deleted for being unambiguous advertising or promotion. So the short answer to your question about which parts is "all parts". See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for an explanation of why it's a bad idea for a company to try to write an encyclopedia article about themselves, and what the alternatives are. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:59:15, 10 September 2018 review of draft by Navysaylorgirl


Navysaylorgirl (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not how to resolve some of the original editor's comments. We had an exchange back when I originally wrote this, and he offered some advice, but now I can't find that page, and it looks like he is taking a break from Wiki. I haven't been paid to write this, so I really don't know what to do about that. Can someone offer some suggestions on more neutral language to use to make this less "overly positive"? I'd really like to get this posted in some form. T/Y

@Navysaylorgirl: The user is not inactive, they just edited an hour and a half ago, see Special:Contributions/Cameron11598. JTP (talk • contribs) 18:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


September 11

Request on 03:04:01, 11 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Navysaylorgirl


I asked for help making the article I submitted more neutral. I was especially confused because the message I get states that the original editor "is taking a short wikibreak." But the editor that responded told me that the original editor was in fact available. However, that editor provided no constructive help, which does me no good. I would simply like to do what is necessary to get this to meet the guidelines. TY


Navysaylorgirl (talk) 03:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Navysaylorgirl. Removing information from non-independent sources can help achieve a neutral point of view. I tried that as an exercise, and there's almost nothing left. The two remaining sources are independent and reliable, but they do not contain significant coverage of Proman. This leads me to conclude, like reviewer Cameron11598, that Proman is not notable (not a suitable subject for a Wikipedia article). No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. The only constructive advice I can offer is to move on to a different topic. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04:03:30, 11 September 2018 review of draft by Mvscrimenti


I don't understand why article submission was rejected. The editor said there weren't enough high-quality sources, but I have 15 news stories about this company from Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, FT and other highly-reputable news sources. Please advise. Mvscrimenti (talk) 04:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:14:16, 11 September 2018 review of submission by Kai Kiat


Draft:Mao_Daqing

Hi. Did anyone see this latest revision?

Kai Kiat (talk) 06:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kai Kiat. No one has seen Draft:Mao Daqing because it has not been submitted for review. You may submit it by clicking the blue button in the large gray box at the top of the draft. Note that the draft has significant formatting problems, possibly caused by copying and pasting a rendered article instead of copying and pasting the wiki markup from the edit tab of an existing article. The draft also misuses external links. There should be no links in the text that take the reader away from Wikipedia. It might be wise to fix those problems before you submit the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:42:17, 11 September 2018 review of draft by Mpwong


I received this response to my submission: Please note Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference. Does this mean that I have to remove internal references to people cited that have Wiki pages?

Mpwong (talk) 12:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mpwong. Yes. Do not write Student of Chiura Obata<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiura_Obata</ref>, because Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and should not be used as a reference. Instead write Student of [[Chiura Obata]] See WP:Linking for more information about internal links.
More generally, you seem to have missed the point of references. In a statement like, "She went on to become a corp de ballet dancer for the San Francisco Opera Ballet Company [1]." the reference must prove that she was a corps de ballet dancer for the San Francisco Opera Ballet Company. The cited source proves nothing of the kind, it's just the San Francisco Opera's homepage, which doesn't mention her at all. See citing sources and WP:REFB for further guidance.
Understand that although the above are important problems to fix, they are not the main problems with the draft. The main problems are that it is based far too heavily on what the artist says about herself, and very little on what independent sources, such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, say about her. An encyclopedia biography should not be a copy of the person's website. By not using independent sources, the draft fails to demonstrate that she is notable (that she belongs in Wikipedia). To correct this, throw away everything you've done and start over, using only independent sources at first. Once you've squeezed everything you can out of independent sources, you may add something non-controversial from non-independent sources here and there to round out the biography. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://sfopera.com/

13:54:28, 11 September 2018 review of draft by Fabregado


Please i want to know if my article is due for publishing? I have corrected every errors there in, but if there is/are any please let me know


Fabregado (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:52:10, 11 September 2018 review of submission by Robroots187


Robroots187 (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I have added more sources and news to qualify ... This is starting to look like discrimination ...

Yes, we require subjects to be notable and do not allow fabricated content such as "has a single produced by Wiz Khalifa" with absolutely no sources to support such a claim. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 12

06:34:24, 12 September 2018 review of submission by Xaviertherapper


Xaviertherapper (talk) 06:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'm not quite sure why this was rejected again. Xavier is a signed artist under a major label and is currently on tour in Europe. We made this page for his fans to look more into his past once he's left their city. If you look though the reference links you'll see tour dates etc. Xavier was also mentioned on Billboard, SlugMag and Complex News/Media. Before I submitted the last article I browsed over other artist in his range with way less notifiable features and and noticed they have Wikipedia pages. This is very unfortunate, I've written articles for way less notable people then Xavier with no trouble. Seems like this young African American artist from Utah still can't catch a break even if his life depended on it. Thanks anyways, Morris Plaza - Artist Manager

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Xaviertherapper#Declare any connection. You write that you've written articles for other people too, evidently not under your Xaviertherapper account. The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account", so you need to disclose all other accounts you've used, and any conflicts of interest you have with topics edited with those accounts. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:15, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Bestow123


How do I resubmit article for review?

Bestow123 (talk) 09:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bestow123. There is a blue "Resubmit" button in the big pink box at the top of the draft. The depth of coverage in the sources is insufficient to demonstrate notability, so there isn't much point in resubmitting unless you can find more substantial sources that are also independent and reliable. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:02:23, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Ninjamukesh


Ninjamukesh (talk) 10:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:42:02, 12 September 2018 review of submission by Shankaruppusamy

I have submitted the page earlier and it was rejected for the lack of structure and references. I have edited the page again. Please review and let me know if this qualifies or to be improved further. Shankaruppusamy (talk) 10:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shankaruppusamy. The draft fails to demonstrate that the subject is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Also, Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11:16:20, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Fuchs ufficiale


There is a Wikipedia article titled Delta del Po which is in Italian, Veneto, and French (among a few other languages) and I think it should exist in English, too. I tried to start a translation of the page, but I was informed that there is a subsection of another page (Po(River)) that already covers the Po River Delta. I am glad that there is information on the Po River Delta online but I think the page of Delta del Po should be available in English as well.

Thank you for your assistance!

Fuchs ufficiale (talk) 11:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fuchs ufficiale. To justify a separate article, you need more than the one paragraph in User:Fuchs ufficiale/sandbox/Po Delta. The best approach would be to start by expanding Po (river)#Po Delta. If and when that section becomes long enough to stand on its own, and too large to continue as part of the river article, it can be spun out into a new article Po Delta. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:25:07, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Adrian Dern


Hello,

i created an article about the "Adolf-Wuerth-Center for the History of Psychology" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adolf-Wuerth-Center_for_the_History_of_Psychology), which has been classified as a draft. There is actually already a german version of that institution and I only wanted to translate and create an "international"/english version of it. Unfortunately I am not able to post the article to the normal Wikipedia-Site and it says that I have to wait for a review that can take more than two months. I actually don't think that there's any necessity to review the article, because of enough sources etc. I would be glad, if you could help me to move the article.

Sincerely A.

Adrian Dern (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:59:18, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Mythbusterbuilding1


Mythbusterbuilding1 (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can I add links on the image section?

17:05:44, 12 September 2018 review of submission by Navysaylorgirl

I

I apologize for perhaps seeming difficult with this. Regarding Worldbruce's exercise in removing the non-neutral data, I understand why some of the citations are considered non-neutral, but I'm having a hard time understanding why a citation from the SEC isn't considered neutral. Also, why is a website showing that Proman is a Board member considered non-neutral, when the "fact" in question is whether he is a Board member or not? I'm confused as to the issue of using NAPW and PDN sources, since those are the companies he founded / worked for, and furthermore, those are acceptable sources in other cases (the NAPW site) to which a search of "Matthew Proman" on Wiki currently links to. Finally, why is Proman suddenly considered not notable, when there was a "Matthew Proman" Wiki page for well over two years, using some of the same citations as the page I'm attempting to put up, and using language that was certainly less neutral? I was attempting to produce a much fairer page, than what originally existed. So why is my attempt so problematic?

Also, I haven't figured out how to respond to the original editor to ask them directly, so I'm not trying to circumvent them. If someone could tell me how to do that, I would -- gladly. TYNavysaylorgirl (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navysaylorgirl (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Navysaylorgirl: For an explanation of Wikipedia's quaint communication mechanism, see Help:Talk pages.
Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or that it has been in any way "approved". It may simply mean that no one has gotten around to deleting it, or perhaps even reading it yet. Proman was never notable. The biography of him that once existed did not follow Wikipedia's rules, and is not an excuse to create an article about him now. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why.
Securities and Exchange Commission filings are not produced by the SEC, but by the company that is the subject of the filing. In this case, the report is produced by a company merging with Proman's company, so it is not an arms-length source.
It's important to distinguish between independence and reliability. An organization's website is a reliable source for Proman being a board member, but is not an independent source. They print about him whatever he tells them to print about him. The same goes for NAPW and PDN. Reliable non-independent sources may be used, but the bulk of any article must come from independent sources. Moreover, only independent sources can establish notability. Absent reliable, independent sources that contain signficant coverage of Proman, he is not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article, which renders moot the question of whether a particular source is reliable for a particular fact - Wikipedia should not have an article about him. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: OK, so then The Daily News, HuffPo and NYT would be acceptable independent sources to establish notability? (I'm hoping I did this right.) Navysaylorgirl (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Navysaylorgirl: This HuffPost page is not independent, it's Proman's author profile, written by Proman. This NY Daily News article is independent, but is not significant coverage, it's a one-sentence trivial mention. This New York Times article, which mentions him as a defendant in a sexual harassment lawsuit, is independent, but is also trivial coverage. It's reliable, and would no doubt end up in his biography if one existed, but neither it nor the other two do anything to establish notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:33:16, 12 September 2018 review of submission by 47.72.203.102


Hi there, this page easily satisfies WP:BAND and there should be no question that a Wikipedia page should ben created considering their size, influence and notoriety in the music industry. (A list detailing how they satisfy this criteria is on Cullen’s talk page). Just because the page has been created very poorly multiple times by overexcited fanboys in the past (and rightly rejected) doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t deserve an article now - billions of streams, headlining at the most prestigious international concerts in the world, EPs charting on the Billboard and a debut album at number 6 on the iTunes charts evidence this. Could you please elaborate? Thanks. 47.72.203.102 (talk) 20:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:02:03, 12 September 2018 review of draft by Tomas Ingram


Tomas Ingram (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC) I don't understand why this article was rejected. The person in question was a silent film actor, and I included a reference citation from Variety, and also findagrave.com, which shows his tombstone. Is he not important enough for a Wikipedia article? or do I have to prove he existed? Please advise.[reply]

@Tomas Ingram: Tomás, You need to provide varied sources, preferably reliable, independent ones suhc as in media and/or academia. He certainly seems somewhat notable as per the number of films we have articles for that he's listed as being in the cast of in the filmography section I have added. FindAGrave simply shows he existed. imdb can be editted by anyone and as a result doesn't cut it as a primary source. He doesn't appear to be very well known in 2018 but there does seem to be alot of wirrten material about him from his era which is where you should ty searching. Google Books and Archive.org, I suggest might be good places to look. If you require help with adding the sources I am happy to help. UaMaol (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


September 13

Request on 01:11:21, 13 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Shibainu21


This is for "Switchboard Live" Thanks for reviewing my article. Could I get some assistance about my references? What criteria is fulfilled and what isn't from the references that are currently there? Thank You!

Shibainu21 (talk) 01:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

02:03:08, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Thegooduser


Will my article be accepted? Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How could it be accepted? There are no notability references. All of your references are to the publication itself or its publisher. Some independent coverage is required to establish WP:notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04:28:55, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Harwn733


Is this the only way to get some attention around here? It said it could take days monthes even at afc. Harwn733 (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Harwn733 (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC) http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joseph-okumu/profil/spieler/453376 Harwn733 (talk) 04:36, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:41:25, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Musicant.oren


My contribution “Edna Schechtman” is waiting very long time (>2 months) for the review process. How can we promote the review process? Musicant.oren (talk) 05:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved the layout, formatting, added wikilinks and a few other minor fixes, but you've got some way to go to demonstrate her notability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:50:32, 13 September 2018 review of submission by 114.240.224.165


114.240.224.165 (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Please I have written this article for to be submitted for publication. Please is there a breach. I need your help .[reply]

Zolor

Zolors is a jewelry brand headquartered in the People’s Republic of China. Its products include earrings, engagement rings, wedding bands, pendants, watches, bracelets and brooches. All Zolors products are made with genuine earth mined sapphires and diamonds. Zolors designs had been influenced by different cultures over different time periods. It styles and designs are primarily from ancient times.  Zolors products are from conflict free mining zones and supply chains located in Asia, Africa and the Americas.

History

“Dating back to the year 997 A.D. in the Song Dynasty of China, Crown Prince Zhao Heng met an orphaned singer Liu’e on the street whom he later got married to. Liu’e was raised by her cousin Gong Mei who was a skilled silversmith and craftsman, making and selling silver crafts, such as jewelry and utensils. The Crown Prince after marrying Liu’e appointed Gong Mei’s workshop as the official imperial court jewelry store. Gong Mei’s jewelry was widely worn by nobles, royals, and imperial guests from all over the world”[1].

Product

Imperial Blue

The imperial blue is a shade of blue unique to the color of sapphires produced from the Zolors’ mining site, which is located in the People’s Republic of China. It is a shade of deep naval blue color, termed as the imperial blue.

Manufacturing

Zolors manufacturing facilities produces 100% of its jewelry products, all pieces are handmade.  

=Press Relations==

Zolors has been reported by the People’s Daily Overseas section, where it showcased the Zolors team.  Apart from this, it also has presence on instagram, linked in, facebook and twitter.

==Designer==

Zolors jewelry was mostly designed by Gongmei and his shop dating back to year 978-1022.    

17:19:52, 13 September 2018 review of draft by 38.142.24.194


This draft is supposed to be a disambiguation page because there are two meanings of "phlashing," one related to phishing and one related to a denial-of-service attack. Both of these meanings are sourced on the pages I mentioned. However, "phlashing" currently redirects only to to the "denial-of-service attack" article. If the disambiguation page is accepted, how will that affect the redirect? Is there a way to remove the redirect? 38.142.24.194 (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC) 38.142.24.194 (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:52:24, 13 September 2018 review of draft by 68.103.78.155


What's Taking So Long It Needs to move into article space now. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


September 14

01:10:25, 14 September 2018 review of draft by The Rank and File


We created a User Page in the Sandbox and it was flagged for immediate deletion. We are unsure if was created correctly as a User Page or if it is an Article and thus under more stringent or different rules? In any case we edited to remove our fundraising website and our social media links and resubmitted it.
Now we realise we can have one link to one official website? Not sure if we should edit again or wait for a reply.
Thank you for any advise.

The Rank and File (talk) 01:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:48:27, 14 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Troy Sheehan


I am needing some assistance to create an infobox for a band's wiki page I am wanting to publish.

Troy Sheehan (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04:18:00, 14 September 2018 review of draft by Summerintx


I would like to make sure my citations and references are formatted correctly. There's a list of four References, consisting of links to news articles, but bylines are not shown for the most part. There are External Links to government sources. Finally there are ten specific full citations (including bylines if any) linking to news sources for the history and other information about the station. That part hangs below the External Links without a heading so it looks busy and not well organized. I don't know if there's a way (or if it should) replace the four items listed under References. But it does not look good as is. I suppose it could be cut to look better, but it's documentation that shows the new article has high validity. Please advise. Thank you. Summerintx (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Summerintx (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:47:30, 14 September 2018 review of draft by MerlijnTurn18


I have re-submitted a text after theroadislong placed comments. I believe it complies with the rules of wikipedia now. But this has been a while ago when I resubmitted it, and it still hasn't been published yet. Please give me clear instructions on what to do next in order to have it published a.s.a.p. Many thanks, kind regards

MerlijnTurn18 (talk) 05:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://m.qulishi.com/mip/news/201512/56974.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=859460906"