User talk:Frayae/Safn 11

G11 sandbox

Hello Frayae, can you recommend a copywriter, knowing the Wikipedia system/policies as non-conformance issues seem to be the issue. Much appreciated, Zsolt -- Zsoltnyiri (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Zsoltnyiri:, I can do some copywriting if you like. Otherwise you could ask at the teahouse. I will point out that the problem with the version of your sandbox I saw was a complete lack of reliable independent sources of information about the subject. These sources are an absolute requirement for verification, a core content policy. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Frayae, I submitted my first contribution but I was striked with G11. What I do not understand is that I followed the format of very similar pages in the same category. What is the major difference between them and my submission that makes it "Unambiguous advertising or promotion"? Cryptoctopus777 (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

This Steem cryptocurrency page is very similar to other in the same category, a category which is so prone to spam that it is under special administrative measures. There are a thousand and one other topics that are not new cryptocurrencies which you could be writing about. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Notability tag

Hi, I saw that you added a notability stub to an article (Boomplay Music). Can you suggest what I can do to further enrich this page? All the references I have put are external and are the significant focus of those news/web articles. I am unsure as to what you'd like to see. Kindly help with any suggestions you might have? Babafemismyth (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Babafemismyth: References 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 14 are not reliable and should be removed. Ideally you want to find any reliable source from outside Nigeria and add that. A lot of the article is unsourced and slightly promotional in tone, this is not ideal. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Frayae: Thanks. That's a bit weird because even the page Spotify references it's "About Us" page and there's not a lot of coverage outside Nigeria/Africa, as it is based in Nigeria and there's not a lot of international coverage of it. Ill continue to find sources and will add any I can find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babafemismyth (talk • contribs) 20:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

BBVA

Hi! No criticism of what you did, in good faith and in response to a specific request, but I've moved BBVA (which just happens to be on my watchlist) back to the title it's been at for the last fourteen years or so (until somebody moved it in July). I think that's a move that shouldn't have been made without discussion (based on my reading of WP:ACRONYMTITLE). Hope this is OK with you? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Fine by me. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria → BBVA (bank) → BBVA → Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria. Looks like someone moved it without much understanding of the guidelines. I agree that a RM would be best if they wanted it moved again. No opinion myself on which title is best. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I too have no opinion on the best title, and indeed about zero interest in the topic. Oh, the joy of Wikipedia! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Fyers wikipedia page

Hi Frayae. Thank You for going through references and letting me know which resource is reliable. Can you tell me please how many reliable references are required to create a page on Wikipedia? Shall I remove all the references that are not reliable? .... Shashank — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashank10490 (talk • contribs) 07:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Shashank10490: You should remove all the unreliable sources. If there are any other reliable sources then add them. Make sure to vote keep in the deletion debate, starting your message with * '''Keep''' and ending it with ~~~~. Explain why you think the company is notable and point out what reliable sources there are. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Frayae. I have re-written that page for Fyers and mentioned only those references which are reliable and removed all the unreliable references as you said. Now I think this page compliance all guidelines of Wikipedia. Could you please vote in favor of Fyers Page in Articles for deletion. Shashank10490 (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Good job. I have struck my nomination and pointed out the improvements. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanx

Thank you Frayae for corecting the Article and puting the references right מיקרוז (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyrfingur Tyrfingsson has been accepted

Tyrfingur Tyrfingsson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SpinningSpark 17:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)