Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliot Cutler (2nd nomination)

Eliot Cutler

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Eliot Cutler
• Articles for deletion/Eliot Cutler (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Eliot Cutler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines. WP:NPOLITICIAN.This was at AfD before with consensus to delete, but it was recreated despite my effort to point that out. 331dot (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC) 331dot (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. There is an ongoing deletion review about the previous article and its AFD, at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2018 September 17#Eliot Cutler, which includes discussion of basic notability of the topic, and discussion of the new article and whether it is different from the deleted article. There is Talk page of the article to discuss the new version, too. I have requested at the deletion review that the old version be restored to draftspace, to inform both the deletion review and the Talk page discussion. This new AFD is duplicative and not helpful. I suggest immediate closure, without prejudice to it being re-started after deletion review is concluded. --Doncram (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

P.S. I'd rather not discuss notability here, because it is being discussed elsewhere, but I believe this person obviously meets NPOLITICIAN, which accepts "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage". --Doncram (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Please demonstrate that coverage. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

That is partly the topic of the deletion review, where i have provided some links going to notability. Again, process-wise, I think this 2nd AFD should be closed as an administrative matter. --Doncram (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

• ’’’Speedy Delete’’’ - this was previously deleted just weeks ago. The ongoing discussion to undo that determines recreation, not the user who undid the redirect I set up. This was an uncalled-for recreation outside the scope of the aforementioned discussion. Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)