User talk:107.77.173.2

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

18:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
107.77.173.2 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

April 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 02:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

UNBLOCK

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

107.77.173.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

THERE IS NO REASON GIVEN FOR MY BLOCK

Decline reason:

The reason is included in the template you see when you attempt to edit as well as the template at the top of this talk page. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ufsjwm catuw61 hkka wwy

EMAIL

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

107.77.173.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

PROVIDING AN EMAIL ON A PUBLIC FORUM SEEMS A VIOLATION OF MY PRIVACY. WHERE IS THE WIKILAW ON THIS NEW RULE? HOW MANY DAYS OR WEEKS HAS THIS BEEN THE RULE?

Decline reason:

For at least a decade. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read the notice - it doesn't say to post the email address here; it says to send the WP:ACC request from a department-issued email address. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Why is this a new rule? For how long has it been in effect? And where does one get this e-mail address from? Do you have a link to the rule? Or a link to the e-mail address? Really, this is ridiculous. You should have given us a public notice. 107.77.173.2 (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

It's not a new rule; that template has been worded that way since before I joined Wikipedia (and I joined in 2006), and it exists to make sure that someone isn't just stealing the organisation's internet connection. We also know, from WP:ABUSE, that organisations will NOT take abuse emails sent by Wikipedia editors (who are all volunteers) seriously at all, and the warnings above should be public notice enough. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

I have been using wikipedia for over a decade, and today is the first day I have ever been asked to provide an e-mail address. I think you are a troll or a scammer. If you keep this up, I will have YOU banned. 107.77.173.2 (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

probably your ISP changed your IP address. The instructions are quite clear. Have you tried following them? Clearly this IP was involved in vandalism. See Special:Contributions/107.77.173.2. Does not go back a decade, does it. You may wish to request a UTRS unblock at Wikipedia:Unblock_Ticket_Request_System. Or you can wait till this block expires on 11/22. There are instructions at WP:unblock. The surest way to not be unblocked is to insult the people capable of unblocking you. There are indications this is a proxy server. No comment about that. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

PS-- pinging @Materialscientist:, the blocking admin, just for the sake of thoroughness. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

I HAVE NEVER HAD THIS PROBLEM BEFORE!!!! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??? HOW IS ASKING A SIMPLE QUESTION ON A DISCUSSION PAGE "VANDALISM"? YOU ARE A DISGRACE TO THIS COUNTRY TREATING VETERANS LIKE THIS FOR NO REASON AT ALL. BECAUSE I HAD A QUESTION!!!

TPA

@Ponyo and Jpgordon: User is abusing the unblock system, please remove TPA. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC) I WAS TRYING TO POST A QUESTION ABOUT INCORRECT DATA ABOUT VETERANS AFFAIRS. WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM!?

I'm a veteran too, so. As a veteran you understand the importance of following instructions. This has grown tedious. And disruptive. 2nding the motion to block TPA. User will not need it to follow directions that have been given. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Yeah. Done. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm Bowling is life. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Josh Dun— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bowling is life (talk) 22:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Crystal Gayle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 20:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Virgil Abloh, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Gatemansgc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Horseradish have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 00:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Teet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Liberal High School (Kansas) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 19:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Liberal High School (Kansas). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Liberal High School (Kansas), you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mike Durfee State Prison— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 15:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)