Jump to content

Talk:Absorption band: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SSTbot (talk | contribs)
top: Added {{vital article}}
Line 8: Line 8:
==Category==
==Category==
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.

== Merge with "[[Absorption bands]]" - which redirects to "[[spectral line]]"? ==

--[[User:Haraldmmueller]] 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:56, 16 October 2018

Template:Vital article

Category

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.

Merge with "Absorption bands" - which redirects to "spectral line"?

--User:Haraldmmueller 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]