Jump to content

Talk:Superdense coding: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Za49 (talk | contribs)
Za49 (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computer science |class=C |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Computer science |class=C |importance=high}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Tulane_University/Quantum_Information_Science_and_Engineering_(Fall_2018) | assignments = [[User:Djobes|Djobes]] }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Tulane_University/Quantum_Information_Science_and_Engineering_(Fall_2018) | assignments = [[User:Djobes|Djobes]], [[User:Baileyruesch|Baileyruesch]] }}


"Quantum dense coding" and "Superdense coding" mean the same thing. The two articles should be merged asa proposed. [[User:Cryptonaut|Cryptonaut]] 02:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
"Quantum dense coding" and "Superdense coding" mean the same thing. The two articles should be merged asa proposed. [[User:Cryptonaut|Cryptonaut]] 02:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:13, 18 October 2018

WikiProject iconComputer science C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Djobes, Baileyruesch (article contribs).

"Quantum dense coding" and "Superdense coding" mean the same thing. The two articles should be merged asa proposed. Cryptonaut 02:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, merge 'em. —Keenan Pepper 02:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correction for diagram.

A IP user has requested that the diagram on this page the modified. They wrote: "Please flip b_1 and b_2 on sender's side! Thanks!" into the figure caption. I am moving the request here where it should be. I would make the change myself, but I'm not sure that it's actually correct or not. —♫CheChe♫ talk 15:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also, I'm thinking of making a new SVG version of the diagram. If anyone can confirm that the requested change is correct, I would be happy to get on that. —♫CheChe♫ talk 15:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The current version of the diagram is correct. --Robin (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Why"

The esteemed editor who keeps pondering "why" has apparently been too kind to point out both the transformations and their results are wrong. So much for "Details".