Talk:SS Fidelitas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:54, 20 October 2018

Ships Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: British / European / German / Italian / World War II Unassessed

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Use of self-published source

hey there, noticed you exclusively use a self-published source for your article. I wasn't here as long as you but i was repeatedly told not to use self-published sources, especially for the stuff that is readily available from other sources (Lloyd's, fire in 1916 was extensively covered by all major US newspapers etc). Not to mention the guy that owns that blog is banned here (User:Olonia). I also think since the ship was for 25 years known under a different name, the article should be named "Bolton Castle" instead. She was also NOT an Italian ship since in fact for a very long time she sailed under British flag. I also think you should cover the ships's whole history in a lot more detail not just 2 years of WWII. Crook1 (talk) 02:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have just replaced every single citation from Colombo's blog, I was totaly unaware that WP had him banned for sockpuppetry. Regarding the proposed renaming of the page and WWII years, the ship notability hinges upon her service as an Axis blockade-runner in the war, when she was one of only two Italian ships to dash through the English Channel. Besides the NY February 2016 fire, operational life of "Bolton Castle" was pretty uneventful.---Darius (talk) 19:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:53, 20 October 2018 edit FarSouthNavy (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 111,720 edits →Use of self-published source: Reply Tag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:54, 20 October 2018 edit undo FarSouthNavy (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 111,720 edits m →Use of self-published source Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:
	hey there, noticed you exclusively use a self-published source for your article. I wasn't here as long as you but i was repeatedly told not to use self-published sources, especially for the stuff that is readily available from other sources (Lloyd's, fire in 1916 was extensively covered by all major US newspapers etc). Not to mention the guy that owns that blog is banned here ([[User:Olonia]]). I also think since the ship was for 25 years known under a different name, the article should be named "Bolton Castle" instead. She was also NOT an Italian ship since in fact for a very long time she sailed under British flag. I also think you should cover the ships's whole history in a lot more detail not just 2 years of WWII. [[User:Crook1\|Crook1]] ([[User talk:Crook1\|talk]]) 02:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)		hey there, noticed you exclusively use a self-published source for your article. I wasn't here as long as you but i was repeatedly told not to use self-published sources, especially for the stuff that is readily available from other sources (Lloyd's, fire in 1916 was extensively covered by all major US newspapers etc). Not to mention the guy that owns that blog is banned here ([[User:Olonia]]). I also think since the ship was for 25 years known under a different name, the article should be named "Bolton Castle" instead. She was also NOT an Italian ship since in fact for a very long time she sailed under British flag. I also think you should cover the ships's whole history in a lot more detail not just 2 years of WWII. [[User:Crook1\|Crook1]] ([[User talk:Crook1\|talk]]) 02:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

	:Hi. I have just replaced every single citation from Colombo's blog, I was totaly unaware that WP had him banned for sockpuppetry. Regarding the proposed renaming of the page and WWII years, the ship notability hinges upon her service as an Axis ~~steamer~~ in the war, when she was one of only two Italian ships to dash through the English Channel. Besides the NY February 2016 fire, operational life of "Bolton Castle" was pretty uneventful.---[[User:DagosNavy\|Darius]] ([[User talk:DagosNavy\|talk]]) 19:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)		:Hi. I have just replaced every single citation from Colombo's blog, I was totaly unaware that WP had him banned for sockpuppetry. Regarding the proposed renaming of the page and WWII years, the ship notability hinges upon her service as an Axis blockade-runner in the war, when she was one of only two Italian ships to dash through the English Channel. Besides the NY February 2016 fire, operational life of "Bolton Castle" was pretty uneventful.---[[User:DagosNavy\|Darius]] ([[User talk:DagosNavy\|talk]]) 19:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)