Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudden jihad syndrome: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Please cite sources. |
m bad link repair, Replaced: {{la| → {{la-admin| using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Sudden jihad syndrome]]=== |
===[[Sudden jihad syndrome]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|I}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|I}} |
||
:{{la|Sudden jihad syndrome}} |
:{{la-admin|Sudden jihad syndrome}} |
||
[[WP:NEO|Neogolism]] that seems to be not all that verifiable, and one guy's [[WP:OR]]. Contested prod. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
[[WP:NEO|Neogolism]] that seems to be not all that verifiable, and one guy's [[WP:OR]]. Contested prod. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
*SJS is an ongoing phenomenon Dr Pipes IS Updated developments and is aware of this Wiki contribution and approves of it and supplied 3 more instances to elucidate the scriptural basis for the syndrome & does so with out using words like Neogolism.[[User:KAOSKTRL|KAOSKTRL]] |
*SJS is an ongoing phenomenon Dr Pipes IS Updated developments and is aware of this Wiki contribution and approves of it and supplied 3 more instances to elucidate the scriptural basis for the syndrome & does so with out using words like Neogolism.[[User:KAOSKTRL|KAOSKTRL]] |
Revision as of 19:12, 8 November 2006
Neogolism that seems to be not all that verifiable, and one guy's WP:OR. Contested prod. Leuko 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- SJS is an ongoing phenomenon Dr Pipes IS Updated developments and is aware of this Wiki contribution and approves of it and supplied 3 more instances to elucidate the scriptural basis for the syndrome & does so with out using words like Neogolism.KAOSKTRL
- That the article doesn't use the word "neologism" doesn't mean that the article isn't original research. So far, all that the article tells us is that this is a syndrome invented by Daniel Pipes, used in xyr on-line articles, and acknowledged by no-one else. Everything in Wikipedia must have been through a processs of fact checking, peer review, publication, and acceptance into the general corpus of human knowledge. That means acknowledgement, and hence documentation, by people other than Daniel Pipes. Ideas that have yet to spread beyond their creators do not belong here, per our Wikipedia:No original research policy. So please cite people other than Daniel Pipes documenting this purported syndrome. Uncle G 17:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)