Jump to content

Talk:Swordfish (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: Line 3:
{{archive basics}}
{{archive basics}}
{{archives}}
{{archives}}

== Cyberpunk? ==

Well, Cyber, maybe. But the film feels about as "punk" as ''2 Fast 2 Furious''. Just a word of warning if you haven't seen it and expect a decent hacker film. &mdash; [[User:Ashmodai|Ashmodai]] <sup>([[User_talk:Ashmodai|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Ashmodai|contribs]])</sup> 13:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:Agreed. That should be removed. I'd do it myself, but I CBF. --Anonymous 16:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
::Definitely not cyberpunk. Checking against criteria defined ni the cyberpunk article, it fails even on the loosest definitions - it's not set in the future and none of the story takes place in the online world. Unless there is anyone willing to defend the cyberpunk position, lose it.
:::OK I'm taking it out
It seems to have a lot in common with the cyberpunk novel Neuromancer. The film probably doesn't qualify as cyberpunk though. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.170.3.86|124.170.3.86]] ([[User talk:124.170.3.86|talk]]) 14:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Jackman Wheeze ==
== Jackman Wheeze ==

Revision as of 03:42, 6 November 2018

WikiProject iconFilm: American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Jackman Wheeze

I think some information about the Jackman Wheeze is required —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mhrmaw (talkcontribs) 11:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I can't find a single reference to the "trademark" Jackman Wheeze anywhere else. I'm removing that blurb unless you can back up your claim that it's his "trademark". It may be funny to some people, but that doesn't mean that it's worth including. Secretagentwang 14:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Jefferosn once shot a man on the white house lawn for treason?

did he really? if not what is the signifigance of this line? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.129.223.109 (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swordfish movie.jpg

Image:Swordfish movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Kudos to whoever removed the unsourced and uninteresting trivia section. I do feel however it's worthwhile to include a link to Swordfish (password) somewhere on the article. I'm putting it in a "See also" section for now. Feel free to work it into the main article. -Verdatum (talk) 17:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It shocks me at all the people that consider triva "worthless". Trivia adds a lot to an article; it gives us a section where we can put interesting facts. THe problem ONLY arrises when trivia becomes 5 pages of people saying stuff like "1 hour and 36 minutes into the film, the price of a coffee in the coffee shop is $2.37. If you take the name swordfish, and give each letter a number value (A=1 B=2 etc.), and those up, multiply by 15, take the sqare root, divide by 300, and multiply that by the cubed root of 1700 you get EXACTLY 2.37!!!!!". As long as its actuall trivia though, and only a few interesting things, a trivia section adds a lot.DurotarLord (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with the stance taken at WP:HTRIV. -Verdatum (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to add sources to that Trivia section? I mean, for example the first fact written there about the hacker speaking German: How to give any source for that? It's just a fact that is obvious to people who know that language when watching the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.187.227.228 (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism

The main goal of the character Gabriel is to steal money to fight terrorism. This movie was released prior to September 11, 2001. The film release on DVD was delayed due to the September 11 terrorist attacks. Few people mention the connection between the movie's focus on terrorism and the terrorist attacks on September 11th. The goal of the character was quite timely considering that the terrorist attacks of September 11th happened soon after the movie's release. Very few citizens of the United States of America considered terrorism to be a substantial threat at that time. The character Gabriel spoke about his goal of protecting the citizens of the U.S.A. and how these same citizens were unaware of the danger that terrorism posed to their lives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duxchik (talkcontribs) 17:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really get how we should conect this in the article, or even say the movie predicted correctly a turn on terrorism danger. Actually, Travolta's character has plans to vanish terrorism against USA by killing people, and so scare others with the possibility of dying too. September 11th terrorists used suicide actions so I don't believe this kind of "scare tatics" would work so much on them. 187.80.116.70 (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Linux operating system'

I know it is Wikipedia policy to refer to the GNU/Linux operating system as 'Linux'. This caused its usual confusion and somebody wrote on this article that Linus Torvalds 'created' the 'Linux operating system'. I changed this to show that he wrote the kernel and I made no mention of the OS. MeatyDoughnut (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]