Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangina (2): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
d/r |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Torn''' - I suspect Mangina is the kind of thing that could have enough references and citations dug up to make a halfways decent article. That said, I'm not sure I want to be googling "Mangina" whilst I'm at work. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 15:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Torn''' - I suspect Mangina is the kind of thing that could have enough references and citations dug up to make a halfways decent article. That said, I'm not sure I want to be googling "Mangina" whilst I'm at work. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 15:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
**Heh, I think not :p '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
**Heh, I think not :p '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
***Well, it passes the ''is this a factual article based on things the average Joe on the street knows already?'' smell test. '''In principle''' almost any dictionary entry can be expanded to create an encyclopaedic article. [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete, redirect''' to Deuce. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">><font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font><</font></b>]] 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete, redirect''' to Deuce. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">><font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font><</font></b>]] 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:16, 9 November 2006
I don't know what state this article was in at the time of its first AfD, but it appears to have had a rather traumatic image on it [1], [2]. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. I recommend that users coming to give their opinions here should look at the article's log, and also that if the article is deleted, it should be protected to prevent recreation. riana_dzasta 08:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- If it was indeed used in Deuce Bigalow, redirect there; otherwise delete as dictdef. Kavadi carrier 09:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. riana_dzasta 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. Kavadi carrier 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Something like kitten huffing and Uncyclopedia?No, kitten huffing was never a real article. Still, redirecting sounds alright by me. Not great, but OK. riana_dzasta 09:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. Kavadi carrier 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. riana_dzasta 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Torn - I suspect Mangina is the kind of thing that could have enough references and citations dug up to make a halfways decent article. That said, I'm not sure I want to be googling "Mangina" whilst I'm at work. WilyD 15:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, I think not :p riana_dzasta 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it passes the is this a factual article based on things the average Joe on the street knows already? smell test. In principle almost any dictionary entry can be expanded to create an encyclopaedic article. WilyD 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, I think not :p riana_dzasta 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, redirect to Deuce. >Radiant< 17:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)