Jump to content

Talk:Western betrayal: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 87: Line 87:
== Section needed on modern Ukraine and the western betrayal against them with regards to the Budapest Memorandum! ==
== Section needed on modern Ukraine and the western betrayal against them with regards to the Budapest Memorandum! ==


The title says it all, young independent Ukraine gave up 2500(!) inherited ex-CCCP live nuclear warheads, for security guarantee but they got a literal toilet paper undersigned by USA, UK, France and later China. None of them have fired even a blank warning shot while Vlad Putin is eating .ur alive... [[Special:Contributions/80.99.11.157|80.99.11.157]] ([[User talk:80.99.11.157|talk]])
The title says it all, young independent Ukraine gave up 2500(!) inherited ex-CCCP live nuclear warheads, for security guarantee but they got a literal toilet paper undersigned by USA, UK, France and later China. None of them have fired even a blank warning shot while Vlad Putin is eating .ur alive... [[Special:Contributions/80.99.11.157|80.99.11.157]] ([[User talk:80.99.11.157|talk]]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 14:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 14:15, 27 November 2018


Contemporary - Syria

Many newspapers use the term when applying to this year's refusal to intervene in the Syrian conflict. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.6.41 (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORUM - your post has no worth to this article.HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this article is already an embarrassment. Don't see why this suggestion would make it any worse. john k (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is purely POV, 'Western betrayal' being not a specific historical event but a POV concept embodied in East European nationalism, so the article has no right to exist. Khamba Tendal (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nowak's book

http://www.wydawnictwoliterackie.pl/ksiazka/3480/Pierwsza-zdrada-Zachodu---Andrzej-Nowak Xx236 (talk) 06:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC) The Curzon line would have allowed the Soviets to kill thousands of Poles.Xx236 (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

France and Britain ... did not declare war on the Soviet Union

They weren't oblidged to do it, let's not mix apples of betrayal (Germany) and oranges of realism (SU).Xx236 (talk) 05:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subsection on Operation Unthinkable

I have added this subsection. The planning of Operation Unthinkable is a source support for two issues presented in the article: that Yalta agreement was not honored by Soviet Union, up to considering military enforcement, and that the enforcement might not be realistically possible. I do not insist on keeping this section, but please discuss with me before removing. There is already a reference in the article to Operation Unthinkable, but it drums up the sensation ("enlist Nazi troops") which I think seriously distorts the issue. Szafranpl (talk) 10:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Section needed on modern Ukraine and the western betrayal against them with regards to the Budapest Memorandum!

The title says it all, young independent Ukraine gave up 2500(!) inherited ex-CCCP live nuclear warheads, for security guarantee but they got a literal toilet paper undersigned by USA, UK, France and later China. None of them have fired even a blank warning shot while Vlad Putin is eating .ur alive... 80.99.11.157 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]