Jump to content

User talk:110.175.251.234: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
decline
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


{{unblock reviewed|reason=I did not vandalise after the block has expired and I am innocent, I do not know why I am accused of abusive use when this is simple false that I have used this IP address abusively, I am sick of being blocked and I am a legitimate user so therefore please unblock me|decline=Make an unblock request from your account. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 03:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I did not vandalise after the block has expired and I am innocent, I do not know why I am accused of abusive use when this is simple false that I have used this IP address abusively, I am sick of being blocked and I am a legitimate user so therefore please unblock me|decline=Make an unblock request from your account. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 03:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)}}

My accounts are blocked forever

Revision as of 04:39, 1 December 2018

June 2018

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ryszard Linkiewicz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 21:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ben Phillips (youtuber). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have learned my lesson from vandalising and won't continue this anymore. I will make useful edits which I agree to do. Please shorten the block

Decline reason:

This is a CheckUser block, which means this IP has been used for block evasion and/or account sockpuppetry - and the block is likely to be extended every time it is misused in that way. If you have an account, please use that if you want to request an unblock. If you don't have an account, you'll have to wait out the block with no block evasion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • By continuing to make IP unblock requests here you are continuing to evade your block, so I have removed your latest request and have revoked talk page access for the duration of the block. If you wish to request unblock, you need to log in to your account and request it from there (and if you have, for example, five accounts, you should make your request from the oldest). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.175.251.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not vandalise after the block has expired and I am innocent, I do not know why I am accused of abusive use when this is simple false that I have used this IP address abusively, I am sick of being blocked and I am a legitimate user so therefore please unblock me

Decline reason:

Make an unblock request from your account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My accounts are blocked forever