Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OS 0.1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Richard3120 (talk | contribs) →OS 0.1: reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
re |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Keep''', the article already has links to reviews in reliable sources coverage, Allmusic and Progressive Sounds, regards [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 12:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', the article already has links to reviews in reliable sources coverage, Allmusic and Progressive Sounds, regards [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 12:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
::Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of ''Mixmag'' and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
::Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of ''Mixmag'' and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::I'm not seeing how Progressive Sounds is remotely close to being reliable (given that it appears that there hasn't been any activity since ~2015 (and it appears to be closer to a blog than a reliable review site). The fact that the mixtape is logged on Allmusic (and that it has no more information than we already have) and no other reliable source does not prove anything tangible. Unless you can provide any other reliable links, I'm unfortunately not seeing your point. [[User:Hiàn|Hiàn]] ([[User talk:Hiàn#top|talk]])<sub>'''editing on [[User:Hiàn (mobile)|mobile account]].'''</sub> 18:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:31, 14 December 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- OS 0.1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Assuming the relevant policy is WP:NALBUM, it fails all criteria - never made any real impact on charts or with sales, no evidence of being broadcast on radio or television networks. Main DEPROD concern was that the mixtape was subject of multiple reliable source reviews - a Google search however reveals close to nothing with several search terms. Hiàn (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hiàn (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Atlantic306. Hiàn (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, the article already has links to reviews in reliable sources coverage, Allmusic and Progressive Sounds, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of Mixmag and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing how Progressive Sounds is remotely close to being reliable (given that it appears that there hasn't been any activity since ~2015 (and it appears to be closer to a blog than a reliable review site). The fact that the mixtape is logged on Allmusic (and that it has no more information than we already have) and no other reliable source does not prove anything tangible. Unless you can provide any other reliable links, I'm unfortunately not seeing your point. Hiàn (talk)editing on mobile account. 18:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of Mixmag and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)