Jump to content

Talk:Richland, Washington: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:
== World War II image not ==
== World War II image not ==


In the World War II paragraph, the original image captioned "Richland during the early days..." actually showed an area under construction after the war, in 1948-49. I replaced it with a more apt image that I found in the gallery.
Help! An incorrect image should be replaced and I'm too infrequent
a contributor to have figured out to how to do it to accord with
Wikipedia protocol (nothingofwater are you there?). The image in
question illustrates the World War II paragraph, and is captioned
"Richland during the early days of the Hanford project." This pic
is actually of an area being built after the war in 1948-49. I
found a more apt one in the gallery. Its URL is
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HD.4D.010_(10409287065).jpg
Fun fact: the field that occupies the lower right area became the
Fun fact: the field that occupies the lower right area became the
neighborhood that now comprises the Gold Coast Historic District.
neighborhood that now comprises the Gold Coast Historic District. [[User:Cpacker666|Cpacker666]] ([[User talk:Cpacker666|talk]]) 01:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
[[User:Cpacker666|Cpacker666]] ([[User talk:Cpacker666|talk]]) 02:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:36, 27 December 2018

WikiProject iconUnited States: Washington / Eastern Washington Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconCities Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled

Starting Richland, Washington discussion page. BiggKwell 00:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Waht do you want to talk about? Williamborg (Bill) 03:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a considerable amount of info on the historic Richland "Alphabet Houses" at http://hanford.houses.tripod.com/ but the information there gives no attributions. I'm trying to locate a source for documentation.

It's "Bookwalter", not "Brookwalter". --DMC198.232.211.130 23:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Sister City"

Why is a sister city in Taiwan given? There is no explanation provided.--Grendlefuzz 11:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture references

In Douglas Coupland's "Shampoo Planet", Richland serves as the loose basis for the main character's fictional hometown "Lancaster". Similarities include the desert climate, the Columbia River, neighboring Pasco, inclusion in Benton County, proximity to nuclear production facilities, and the the high school's mushroom cloud mascot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.164.250 (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Famous People"

You should add Travis Buck of the Oakland Athletics to famous people. He was born and raised in Richland and he attended Richland High.

Hanford workers camp location

I have removed this from the text of the article, as it was inappropriately placed there:

"Correction.

The Hanford construction workers housing camp built during WW II was located approximately 35 miles (56 km) north of Richland. The construction workers camp that was built for the early Cold War (1947-49) expansion was located less than five miles north of Richland."

If a good reference could be found to clear up the disagreement, that would be well.—Saxifrage 17:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images

There are too many images in this article. Try having images placed in an appropriate category at Wikimedia Commons (Main Page) and place an interwiki link to it in the "See also" section. -- allennames 03:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I failed to note the photo gallery section. I will move the images from the main body of the article into the photo gallery section. Please consider witch images belong in the main body of the article before moving them back. -- allennames 05:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The images were all moved to the gallery section, which was then removed in place of a link to the commons. Now we have gone from an article with 'too many images' to one with no images at all. The style manual says nothing (that I could find) about banning images from cities' articles. I will replace some of the images as soon as I find time - but in the interest of those who felt there were 'too many images' - I will try to show restraint. Nothingofwater (talk) 05:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what happened, but none of the images removed from this page's 'gallery' made it to the Commons page that was inserted in their place. I'm going to have a crack at figuring out how that is done, and see if I can fix it. Nothingofwater (talk) 20:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Try Category:Richland, Washington and commons:Category:Richland, Washington. Look for the bridge photo here. – allennames 02:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Washington Way

The text of this article states that G-way was named after George Washington, the first president. Is that substantiated somewhere, or is there a chance that it was named after George Washington Goethals, who is more in line with the other engineers that have Richland streets named after them? Just wondering if it is referenced anywhere... Nothingofwater (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One might guess that Goethals Drive in Richland is named after George Washington Goethals - so it would seem excessive to name both George Washington Way and Goethals Drive named after the same individual. But that's all speculation. We need a reference and I can't help you there. Cheers - Williamborg (Bill) 04:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And to make it more interesting, http://www.answers.com/topic/george-washington-goethals states "In World War II the United States liberty ship SS G. W. Goethals was named in his honor. He has one street named for him in the city of Richland, Washington." So which street was it - Goethals Drive or George Washington Way...? Or did he actually get two "named" after him by a fan who was into subtlety? Williamborg (Bill) 04:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And to make it worse - I now find that the source behind www.answers.com is, you guessed it - a Wikipedia article. Recursion probably doesn't make for truth. Williamborg (Bill) 04:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that George Washington (the president) is better known for being a president then any kind of civil engineer. To put it a different way, if one were asked to name well-known engineers, would George Washington make the list among the others (Stevens, Goethals, Thayer, etc)? Reading the George Washington article, i see that he was home-schooled, and worked as a surveyor from age 17-18. After this, he was elected as the county surveyor of the newly-created county. While admirable, it doesnt really set him aside as an engineer. If the street in Richland was indeed named after George Washington, then we can say so - but saying that it is an example of streets being named after notable engineers seems like a stretch without some kind of supporting documentation. Nothingofwater (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
George Washington just might be included among the engineering types if you were trying to include a president and this was the only one you could think of who did anything related to engineering. And my generation of Americans learned in grade school that Washington was a surveyor. So the statement as written isn't implausible.
However, plausible or not, it really should have an inline citation. The Richland Library has several books on the "letter homes" that would cover this bit of history - either you or I ought to go check that out when we're next out that way. Unless you want to volunteer to find it, you can let me see what can be done when I next get up from Portland.
Cheers - Williamborg (Bill) 03:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closed city?

That statement that Richland was a restricted-access city during WW II is incorrect. I was born there in 1945 and it was an open city during my childhood. I recall reading somewhere that the open access was one feature that distinguished it from the other two Manhattan project towns, Oak Ridge and Los Alamos. --Charles Packer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.36.60 (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asked my 90-year-old mom & she confirmed that Richland was never a closed city, so I removed the statement from the article. 216.164.40.79 (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Charles Packer[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richland, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Richland, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


World War II image not

In the World War II paragraph, the original image captioned "Richland during the early days..." actually showed an area under construction after the war, in 1948-49. I replaced it with a more apt image that I found in the gallery. Fun fact: the field that occupies the lower right area became the neighborhood that now comprises the Gold Coast Historic District. Cpacker666 (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]