Jump to content

Talk:Ann Patchett: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wp Tennessee
top: wpww
Line 7: Line 7:
{{WikiProject California|class=c|importance=low|auto=inherit}}
{{WikiProject California|class=c|importance=low|auto=inherit}}
{{WikiProject Tennessee|class=c|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Tennessee|class=c|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|class=c|importance=low|auto=inherit}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|class=c|importance=mid}}


== Date of birth ==
== Date of birth ==

Revision as of 21:13, 28 December 2018

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
WikiProject iconCalifornia C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconTennessee C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconAnn Patchett is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member.
[Project Articles][Project Page][Project Talk][Assessment][Template Usage]
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date of birth

IMDB has her birthday as November 2. Donald Hosek (talk) 00:12, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is a link to Byliner.com inappropriate? It's a collection of links to works by the author, all of which are online, and free. I looked over the submission guidelines, and I'm not sure which rule the link violates. It's a private company, but it's a well-maintained collection and it's directly relevant to the author because it's her work. I'm new at this, so that may not be right, but seems like a good link. Pocushocus (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a good link. See the the linking policy, WP:EL for starters. There's no effective difference between linking to it and linking to on-line bookstores such as Amazon or B&N. If we allowed this type of link, every article would be full of dozens to hundreds of links to affiliate marketers, who would war amongst themselves for placement. Studerby (talk) 23:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

Patchett wrote a memoir, entitled The Getaway Car, and published it electronically in 2011. Doesn't it belong in her bibliography? I understand that it's not as long as a full book, but it's much longer than a magazine feature, and it was published individually, albeit as an ebook. Pocushocus (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of this date

Came here for details on Commonwealth (2016), and stayed on, after finding that information, and much else, incomplete and non-encyclopedic.

In addition to copyediting (Published works list, etc.), I call attention to the following issues, having corrected them as much as I can today:

  • Repaired the lede:
* Added dates to the published works in the lede (and in later sections);
* Reordered listed works chronologically;
* Copied material in the lede into the main body (e.g., DOB, as per WP policy, ledes are to summarize articles, not intro new material);
* Checked all lede content against the body and sources, finding most needed sources, but
* Ultimately noted that the lede, though accurate, was not representative of the article—no bookstore, overemphasis on awards, etc.).
Note the sources that now appear in the lede can be removed in the re-written lede; they appear now as placeholders, to indicated which material in the lede is and is not sourced (and to make clear that the new lede must be fully sourced).
  • Fixed citations.
* Provided or completed a large number of missing citations, fixing many dead links, esp. for awards, because these were quickly located, and allowed me to remove most tags from the lede (Orange, PEN/Faulkner, Pushcart, Helmerich and Wellcome prize citations and dates; Guggenheim date and citation; Hart citn for "Run" NYT piece; repeat-cited Dave Weich interview; Guardian, Atlatic, and Time citations);
* Generally standardized citation entries, using cite book and cite journal templates;
* Fixed the long standing dead link to AP's personal website, and noted that this repeat cited autobiography is a non-independent, non-third-party source, and
* Removed IMDB as a source, and noted GoodReads as a poor source.
  • Did other miscellaneous edits:
* Made the Published works section heading standard, copyedited that section, and noted need for full citations in it;
* Moved inappropriate IMDB citation for Patron Saint of Liars to ‎External links from main body, and did the same when a second checked citation was found not to contain content supporting the sentence to which it was attached;
* Noted a series of cases where updating material has begun being added without sources, and placed an in-text markup note stating "PLEASE DO NOT ADD UNSOURCED MATERIAL TO THIS BLP ARTICLE."; and
* Otherwise made the awards entries more standard, and touched up any other non-encyclopedic aspects I came across.

FInally, I added what I perceive to be a minimal set of article tags, gathering most issues into a "Expert needed" tag (so 3-4 tags could be avoided), and specifically calling for further attention to the need for independent, third-party sources (since most bio material remains drawn from interviews and a self-published web autobiography).

Spent hours. Revert only selectively, or you will throw away much new citation material, and value added content form this scholar. Le Prof 73.211.138.148 (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

------------
The link to "Commonwealth" goes the wrong place at the moment -- to the article ... about the generic term. For the intergovernmental organization, see Commonwealth of Nations. For other uses, see Commonwealth (disambiguation). I suppose someone will write an article about Patchett's book, "Commonwealth." What should that article's name be? Two sensible names might be Commonwealth (book) or Commonwealth (novel), but both of those are already taken. Le Prof, thanks for your work thus far -- if you would like to fix this, fine with me! Oaklandguy (talk) 05:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ann Patchett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]