Talk:Windows Management Instrumentation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:47, 13 November 2006

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Isn't it Windows Management Interface--not instrumentation?

No, the page author(s) is/(are) correct; it's "instrumentation". The following from the MSDN Library: "Summary: Introduces Microsoft Windows Management Instrumentation, part of Windows 2000 (but available for Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows NT 4.0), which is designed to help you manage your enterprise systems, applications, and networks as they become larger and more complex." (MSDN Library http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwmi/html/mngwmi.asp) I guess that page is a "little" (O.o) outdated, but I assume the name was never changed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.224.89.239 (talk • contribs) .

This article looks like it has been plagiarised from a microsoft document. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Janstetka (talk • contribs) .

I agree - hardly NPOV —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.196.239.2 (talk • contribs) .

The article has a header "Why is it important to write a WMI provider for our customers?" in addition to a non-NPOV, no doubt courtesy of M$! I'm no expert on WMI so I won't try editing this, but I think this should be replaced - it's not a wikipedia article. -psych787

Revision as of 05:14, 3 August 2006 edit Warren (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 23,232 edits m oops. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:47, 13 November 2006 edit undo 68.33.200.201 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I agree - hardly NPOV <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:217.196.239.2\|217.196.239.2]] ([[User talk:217.196.239.2\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/217.196.239.2\|contribs]]) {{{2\|}}}.</small>		I agree - hardly NPOV <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:217.196.239.2\|217.196.239.2]] ([[User talk:217.196.239.2\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/217.196.239.2\|contribs]]) {{{2\|}}}.</small>

			The article has a header "Why is it important to write a WMI provider for our <font color=purple><b><u>customers</u></b></font>?" in addition to a non-NPOV, no doubt courtesy of M$! I'm no expert on WMI so I won't try editing this, but I think this should be replaced - it's not a wikipedia article. <small>-psych787</small>