Talk:PlayStation: The Official Magazine: Difference between revisions
m deprecating defunct WP:VG task forces using AWB |
→Source: new section |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 15:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 15:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Source == |
|||
*https://web.archive.org/web/20010521211639/http://www.gamedaily.com:80/news/april_00/4_17/index.shtml |
Revision as of 06:01, 31 December 2018
Magazines Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Merge
I think that these two articles should be merged since PSM is turning into PS:OM.--Playstationdude 02:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Computer Gaming World didn't have it's article merged with Games for Windows when it was renamed. I think both PSM and PS:OM should stay separate. Gamerzworld 22:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just have PSM redirect to here.---- Playstationdude (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Opm COVER.jpg
Image:Opm COVER.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)