Talk:Don Z. Zimmerman: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:27, 6 January 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don Z. Zimmerman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / Biography / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Oregon B‑class Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

A fact from Don Z. Zimmerman appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 January 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in planning the capture of the Marshall Islands during World War II, Don Z. Zimmerman disputed Charles Darwin's theory about the evolution of the coral reefs—and was proven correct?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Don Z. Zimmerman.

Wikipedia

Journalistic buzz words about Darwin's theory need to go

Zimmerman did not refute Darwin's theory. This is just some journalist trying to write a catchy title, and our "did you know" editor falling for it. Darwin lived in the 1800s, formulated his theory before he even saw a reef, and did not suggest it would cover every situation.

Really, this whole concept of refuting theories should go unless someone can pull it from a reliable source. This is titillation, not wiki.

184.69.174.194 (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I had a read of the source text, and it admits it doesn't know what it is talking about. Zimmerman did not refute Darwin's theory, he seems to have tried to add to it and broaden it, as so often happens in science. Only a journalist would call this "refuting" a theory, as "conflict journalism" often does.

To get this right, we'd have to go back to the paper by Zimmerman, which people are welcome to do. Meanwhile, "refute" is the wrong word, and not supportable. 184.69.174.194 (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin definitely saw coral reefs on his circumnavigation voyage in the Beagle. If you can give me a reference to the Zimmerman's paper I can update the article.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I added the "better source needed" tag was because AdderUser added a link - "Zimmerman's Competing Theory of Reef Formation" - to the "See also" section of the article The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs, linking back to this article (as well as a comment to that article's Talk page).

I tried searching online, but couldn't find anything published by Zimmerman, beyond finding that he had been doing his research at Scripps. It's possible that, being wartime, his paper may have been classified by the military, rather than published openly in the academic press, which raises the question of how widely his theory was known, and how influential it was. Without seeing the paper, it's also impossible to gauge if his model can be said to be a "competing" theory to Darwin's, or merely a refinement. Bahudhara (talk) 00:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who added the "See also" to The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs after reading the article about Zimmerman. I didn't want to overdo it, so I left it as a "See also" (although calling it a COMPETING theory might have overdone it!). I specifically did not want to say that Zimmerman proved Darwin wrong because there was not a lot of proof of that here. I do think that a cross-reference (See also) to Zimmerman could be helpful and should remain. Do you think the "competing" should be deleted or modified? "Competing" does not mean wrong. It could just mean that Theory-Version-17 works better than Theory-Version-11 in a particular instance. I will take one further guess that Zimmerman's "published paper" might be a post-war declassified document published in some military report rather than in a peer reviewed journal. AdderUser (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ::The reason that I added the "better source needed" tag was because [[User:AdderUser|AdderUser]] added a link - "Zimmerman's Competing Theory of Reef Formation" - to the "See also" section of the article ''[[The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs]]'', linking back to this article (as well as [[Talk:The_Structure_and_Distribution_of_Coral_Reefs#Added_a_%22See_Also%22_for_Zimmerman%27s_Competing_Theory_of_Reef_Formation|a comment]] to that article's Talk page).
 ::I tried searching online, but couldn't find anything published by Zimmerman, beyond finding that he had been doing his research at [[Scripps Institution of Oceanography|Scripps]]. It's possible that, being wartime, his paper may have been classified by the military, rather than published openly in the academic press, which raises the question of how widely his theory was known, and how influential it was. Without seeing the paper, it's also impossible to gauge if his model can be said to be a "competing" theory to Darwin's, or merely a refinement. [[User:Bahudhara|Bahudhara]] ([[User talk:Bahudhara|talk]]) 00:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
+:::I'm the one who added the "See also" to [[The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs]] after reading the article about Zimmerman. I didn't want to overdo it, so I left it as a "See also" (although calling it a '''COMPETING''' theory might have overdone it!). I specifically did not want to say that Zimmerman proved Darwin wrong because there was not a lot of proof of that here. I do think that a cross-reference (See also) to Zimmerman could be helpful and should remain. Do you think the "competing" should be deleted or modified? "Competing" does not mean wrong. It could just mean that Theory-Version-17 works better than Theory-Version-11 in a particular instance. I will take one further guess that Zimmerman's "published paper" might be a post-war declassified document published in some military report rather than in a peer reviewed journal. [[User:AdderUser|AdderUser]] ([[User talk:AdderUser|talk]]) 04:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)