Jump to content

Talk:Progress (spacecraft): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Planemo (talk | contribs)
Line 43: Line 43:
::::What's the difference from a space station module?--[[User:Nixer|Nixer]] 07:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
::::What's the difference from a space station module?--[[User:Nixer|Nixer]] 07:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::Space station modules are (semi-)permanent fixtures of the station and generally cannot operate independently. The Progress is a cargo ferry, and is only entered for loading and unloading, and operates independently and unmanned when not attached to the space station. [[User:Variable|siafu]] 00:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
:::::Space station modules are (semi-)permanent fixtures of the station and generally cannot operate independently. The Progress is a cargo ferry, and is only entered for loading and unloading, and operates independently and unmanned when not attached to the space station. [[User:Variable|siafu]] 00:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
::::::This is the key word: '''unmanned when not attached to a space station'''. I will change the article. --[[User:Planemo|Planemo]] 08:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:06, 15 November 2006

Do we need to include the Everything2 sig at the bottom? I am unfamiliar with their license but if it doesn't need to be included, it shouldn't be... -lommer 20:39, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Many changes have been done since the original Everything2 version. I also suggest removing the label.

I think that the references to N2O2 oxidiser in this article should actually be N2O - can someone check this?--NHSavage 10:40, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed - just a typo, the linked article was correctly N2O4.--NHSavage 10:58, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ATV delayed::

The ATV has been delayed till ~ mid 2007. Changed accordingly.--subzero788 4:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Phoenix Studio TheWorld Browser End User License Agreement Copyright 2004 Phoenix Studio, All Rights Reserved.

TheWorld is free for personal, home use.

You may use this software only as described in this license.

If you do not agree to the terms of this license, do not install or use the software.

1. SOFTWARE. The <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">vinyl cutter</a> capitalized term "Software" used below refers to TheWorld Browser, any <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser engraver</a>updates to the software, any supplemental <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser engraving machine</a> code provided to you by Phoenix Studio, the <a href="http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=hflaser">laser engraver</a> user manual, any associated software components, any related media and printed materials, and any "online" or electronic documentation.

2. RESTRICTIONS. You may not reduce the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser cutting machine</a> Software to human readable form, reverse engineer, de-compile, or disassemble the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">cutting plotter</a> Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation. You may not rent, lease, or lend the Software. You may not use the <a href="http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=hflaser">vinyl cutter</a> Software to perform any unauthorized transfer of information, such as copying or transferring a file in violation of a copyright, or for any illegal purpose. You may not remove any copyright, trademark, reservation of rights, or any other proprietary language displayed on, in, or with the <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">vinyl cutter</a> Software.

3. SUPPORT SERVICES. Phoenix Studio may provide you with <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser engraver</a> support services related to the Software. Use of support services is governed by the <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser cutting machine</a> user manual, online documentation, and other Phoenix Studio materials, as they may be modified from time to time. Phoenix Studio may use any information you provide as part of obtaining <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser engraving machine</a> support services for its business purposes, including product support and development.

4. TERMINATION. This license terminates if you fail to comply with its terms and conditions. If your license terminates, you must destroy all copies of the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com/cp.html">cutting plotter</a> Software. The termination of this license does not limit Phoenix Studio's other rights it may have by law.

5. COPYRIGHT. You acknowledge that you have only the limited, non-exclusive right to use and copy the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com/cp.html">vinyl cutter</a> Software as expressly stated in this license and that Phoenix Studio retains title and all other rights. The <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">low cost laser engraver</a>Software is protected by copyright law and international treaty provisions as well as other applicable laws.

6. NO WARRANTIES. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com/le.html">laser engraver</a> Software is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, the implied warranties or merchantability, fitness for a particular

The End

Unmanned?

Is it correct to call this spacecraft unmanned when it is unmanned only during the launch and re-entry and when docked with a space station it can be entered and inhabited by astronauts? If it is still unmanned, then all modules of the space station also should be called unmanned since they also inhabited only when docked to the station.--Planemo 20:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with it being called unmanned, it is not flown my anyone inside. It can only be entered if attached to the space station in orbit. I suppose it could make clear in the article that the spacecraft when attached to the space station acts basically as another section of it, allowing astronauts to enter it. But the important thing is that it is never used for flight (either into orbit, in orbit, or in re-entry) manned. Anyway that is IMHO 128.243.220.21 14:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC) this is me Lethaniol 14:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, a spacecraft attached to a space stantion work essentially like a module of the station. And all modules of a manned space station considered manned, in spite no one ever entered in orbit in it or re-entered atmosphere.--Planemo 16:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you've worked out a consensus on this. FWIW, I agree that technically its considered unmanned, even if it does support life while docked with the station. Shell babelfish 23:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What's the difference from a space station module?--Nixer 07:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Space station modules are (semi-)permanent fixtures of the station and generally cannot operate independently. The Progress is a cargo ferry, and is only entered for loading and unloading, and operates independently and unmanned when not attached to the space station. siafu 00:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the key word: unmanned when not attached to a space station. I will change the article. --Planemo 08:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]