Jump to content

User:Helena12435/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
I added a summary for a rose for emily
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{Article Evaluation } Melodic Motion
{Article Evaluation exercise } Melodic Motion


* Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? In my opinion everything is quite relevant and nothing really distracted me except for the beginning when it was swapping between the different types of melodies.
* Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? In my opinion everything is quite relevant and nothing really distracted me except for the beginning when it was swapping between the different types of melodies.

Revision as of 15:10, 24 January 2019

{Article Evaluation exercise } Melodic Motion

  • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? In my opinion everything is quite relevant and nothing really distracted me except for the beginning when it was swapping between the different types of melodies.
  • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Nothing is missing. And it is all good to DATE.
  • What else could be improved? I believe that there could be some examples in there.
  • The tone is very neutral and a few things are under-presented . The kind of gloss over some of it.
  • All the links work and valid. The sources come from creditable and neutral articles. They are more factual if anything.
  • I don't see any ratings or talks.


Edit summary for my class ENGL1102.40 "A rose for Emily" This short story was about how shortly after her father's death, Emily discovers her necrophiliac intentions and would go on to kill her own husband. (http://xroads.virginia.edu/~drbr/wf_rose.html)