Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Kaczorowski: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:32, 25 January 2019

Mick Kaczorowski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a strong question as to the subject's notability. While he has won some awards from a notable institution, these are shared and so I do not believe satisfy the requirements of WP:ANYBIO.

He has been involved in the creation of several relatively notable works, but I do not believe they hold sufficient notability to meet the requirements under WP:DIRECTOR.

If he does not meet the criteria for notability under any of those then I do not believe he meets the criteria under WP:GNG. None of the references provided in the article are suitable for establishing this (IMDB, TVGuide), and some are not suitable at all (docuWiki). A search does bring up a few articles mentioning him, but either he is the author [1] or is only mentioned in passing by an article discussing his current project. [2][3][4][5]

However, given the combined awards, programs and passing coverage, I am not certain he doesn't meet the required standards of WP:N. If he does, however, then the article needs significant work to bring it up to a standard reasonable for inclusion on Wikipedia. NoCOBOL (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep I'd say he pretty clearly meets #3 and #4 of WP:DIRECTOR (though I would have used the Filmmaker tag). He's played a major role in co-creating a body of work: Meerkat Manor alone qualifies him for that, let alone everything else. And he's won two Emmys for his work as a filmmaker.^[1] The article may not be great, but it seems to me that this is a clear case where editing would be preferable to deletion. ManicSpider (talk) 14:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.emmys.com/bios/mick-kaczorowski

[1] ttps://www.emmys.com/bios/mick-kaczorowski

[1]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 00:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Mick Kaczorowski]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
+*'''Strong Keep''' I'd say he pretty clearly meets #3 and #4 of [[WP:DIRECTOR]] (though I would have used the Filmmaker tag). He's played a major role in co-creating a body of work: Meerkat Manor alone qualifies him for that, let alone everything else. And he's won two Emmys for his work as a filmmaker.<ref> https://www.emmys.com/bios/mick-kaczorowski </ref> The article may not be great, but it seems to me that this is a clear case where editing would be preferable to deletion. [[User:ManicSpider|ManicSpider]] ([[User talk:ManicSpider|talk]]) 14:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)