Talk:Roanoke Colony

Confusing reference to geographical location

This phrase: " at the site of the ancient Croatoan capital, 50 miles (80 km) from the old Roanoke colony", should have an indication of the actual location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.221.18.82 (talk) 14:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2016

Mommy bubbles (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Can you clarify what you're requesting? —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 17:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Colony Name?

Roanoke is a native American word for white beads make from shell (origin- From Powhatan rawrenock "things rubbed smooth by hand")so using that word would be after the colony was already in place I would think. Did Elizabeth/Raleigh have a English name for the new colony or was it just formed and sent without one? It wouldn't be under the Virginia Company would it as that wasn't formed until James I was in power in 1603 (Jamestown 1607)? I do know the Virginia charter was vast ("sea to sea") and covered most of Carolina and overlapped the Plymouth charter founded later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.126.193.15 (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Dead reference

Reference #27 seems to no longer link to a paper or an article - It seems rather important, too. Does anyone know of other sources?--92.243.251.196 (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

updated with http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9244947/Ancient-map-gives-clue-to-fate-of-Lost-Colony.html Meters (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Tobacco and potato in Europe

e

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roanoke Colony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150122232636/http://www.newsobserver.com/2015/01/19/4488133/researchers-hopeful-that-nc-site.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2015/01/19/4488133/researchers-hopeful-that-nc-site.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.outer-banks.com/hatteras-school/dig98.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Why is there no reference to the obvious?

And vastly more probable. That, like many early colonies, they were massacred by natives? There's zero reference to mass murder or killing by natives within the article besides one single reference to the first colonist murdered whilst fishing for crabs. Why would the most obvious conclusion not be listed, even in passing? Further, why is this semi-protected when the user requesting semi-protection was clearly told that their request was invalid? This needs unprotection, as it doesn't require it. I am suspicious that removal of massacre by natives seems to coincide with the request for protection. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 11:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

There was never any evidence of a massacre..no bodies no evidence of a confrontation..the buildings had all been taken down in an orderly manner..there was no evidence whatsoever of the colony doing anything but what they had always intended which was to migrate 50 miles into the mainland 2600:1702:2340:9470:D997:924F:DB78:405 (talk) 00:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Removed un-sourced section, RE: Pop Culture

Feel free to find a source and add each back in: