User:Nayyomii/sandbox

Article Evaluation : Human Services

Everything in the article seems to be at least moderately relevant to the topic.

Although most seems to be general information, a paper referenced in the article is from 2016 so some could say an update is due.

This article seems to focus primarily on the United States. There is a brief mention of Human Services in Canada, but is barely a short paragraph.

Although there are likely many countries in the world with human services programs, this article only represents the United States, making it hard to compare and contrast how their systems might differ.

Unfortunately most of the links either lead to other Wikipedia articles or don't work at all. This means that either the article likely hasn't been updated recently as the previously linked sites are no longer supported, or the links were never operable and did not get properly checked for validity.

Checking the validity of the facts stated in this article would require an in-depth search via the multiple Wiki pages linked in the article. This would make things moderately difficult as each page we are taken to would also have to validated. With this, however, the information seems to be mostly unbiased and informative.

Behind the scenes most of the communication is includes a question as to whether social work in other countries should be given their own pages or not. Some have linked what they believe to be Wikipedia articles relevant or related to the subject, but were unsure where these links belonged in the article itself.

This article is a part of a WikiProject and has been rated high importance to the project but does not have a quality rating.

Article Selection:

1.Crisis accommodation:

Although the article is very short it seems to cover the very basic understanding of the topic. There doesn't seem to be any bias in the information and the citations seem to be mostly links to other Wikipedia articles to help define certain words used in the stub. As far as the talk page, it seems a student has added quite a few links to websites and articles they found to be relevant to the stub. These may be helpful in expanding the page's content.

https://www.housing.vic.gov.au/crisis-emergency-accommodation

https://www.usa.gov/housing-help-audiences

https://www.launchhousing.org.au/service/crisis-accommodation/

http://www.entrypointperth.com.au/services

2. Strengthening Families:

This article is also very short, being just a few sentences. The information seems to be unbiased and doesn't really have enough words to imply anything other than the absolute basics. Most of the links are to other Wikipedia articles, and three are to the organization itself. Due to the fact those links refer to the organization's website their information may not be entirely neutral. This article does not seem to have any content in the "talk" page, but is within the scope of Wiki Project Organizations.

https://cssp.org/our-work/project/strengthening-families/

http://www.cebc4cw.org/program/strengthening-families-program-sfp/detailed

https://www.strengtheningfamiliesprogram.org/

3. Disney PhotoPass

This article is shallow and seems to get just the basic idea of the service. The article seems to be unbiased and contains only relevant information. There are a few citations and references made at the bottom of the stub. The links given in the stub to be mostly accurate or reliable to the information posted in the stub. This stub does not appear to be within the bounds of any WikiProjects. Unfortunately the "talk" page is mostly just references to previous edits regarding external links and formatting.

https://mydisneyphotopass.disney.go.com/

https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/guest-services/photo-pass-service/

https://www.tripsavvy.com/how-does-disney-photopass-work-1586469

https://www.undercovertourist.com/blog/disneys-photopass-pros-cons/

https://www.disneytouristblog.com/photopass-plus-review/