User talk:Bellezzasolo: Difference between revisions
Bellezzasolo (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
;Project updates |
;Project updates |
||
* [[mw:ORES|ORES predictions]] are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, |
* [[mw:ORES|ORES predictions]] are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, banter, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review. |
||
* There are now tools [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#New_bot_trial_for_copyvios|being tested]] to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog. |
* There are now tools [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#New_bot_trial_for_copyvios|being tested]] to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog. |
||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
::::::In any case, whatever you all want to do. The padlocks are set so that you can modify the description page but you cannot move or upload over them on Commons. --[[User:Majora|Majora]] ([[User talk:Majora|talk]]) 04:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
::::::In any case, whatever you all want to do. The padlocks are set so that you can modify the description page but you cannot move or upload over them on Commons. --[[User:Majora|Majora]] ([[User talk:Majora|talk]]) 04:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::::: I can't see any function difference between the local protection and the current situation either, it should be safe to reenable the new icons. [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 04:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
::::::: I can't see any function difference between the local protection and the current situation either, it should be safe to reenable the new icons. [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 04:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::::: {{ping|Bellezzasolo|Majora}} yes its mostly to avoid any issues with 'those commons' people that have rarely occurred. The protection I was referring to is just "upload" protection - it could be very embarrassing for image |
::::::: {{ping|Bellezzasolo|Majora}} yes its mostly to avoid any issues with 'those commons' people that have rarely occurred. The protection I was referring to is just "upload" protection - it could be very embarrassing for image banter. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 12:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
{{od}} {{hp|xaosflux}}Is there a reason not to add them to the cascade-protected page? Pretty sure the old icons were/are. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Amory</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small> 23:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
{{od}} {{hp|xaosflux}}Is there a reason not to add them to the cascade-protected page? Pretty sure the old icons were/are. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Amory</span><small style="color:#555"> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small> 23:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
:{{Re|Amorymeltzer}} I don't see that as necessary - it's not a big deal if someone edits the description, and in most cases the "click" is bypassed so they won't just end up on the description page. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 23:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
:{{Re|Amorymeltzer}} I don't see that as necessary - it's not a big deal if someone edits the description, and in most cases the "click" is bypassed so they won't just end up on the description page. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 23:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
:If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today. |
:If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today. |
||
:We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of |
:We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of banter, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution. |
||
:With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-10-28/Special_report|''The Signpost'' Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers']], and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Special report|article in this month's upcoming issue]] of ''The Signpost'' which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed. |
:With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-10-28/Special_report|''The Signpost'' Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers']], and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Special report|article in this month's upcoming issue]] of ''The Signpost'' which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed. |
||
Line 501: | Line 501: | ||
Hello Bellezzasolo - I'm not sure why you said I didn't quote a reliable source when I edited the Believer's Eastern Church page<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Believers_Eastern_Church</ref>. The source I cited (and I cite a source) is the church's own website<ref>https://www.bec.org/athanasius-yohan/</ref>. Can you please explain to me how that is not a reliable source? Thank you!--[[User:Elfgirl13|Elfgirl13]] ([[User talk:Elfgirl13|talk]]) 23:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Bellezzasolo - I'm not sure why you said I didn't quote a reliable source when I edited the Believer's Eastern Church page<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Believers_Eastern_Church</ref>. The source I cited (and I cite a source) is the church's own website<ref>https://www.bec.org/athanasius-yohan/</ref>. Can you please explain to me how that is not a reliable source? Thank you!--[[User:Elfgirl13|Elfgirl13]] ([[User talk:Elfgirl13|talk]]) 23:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
: {{re|Elfgirl13}} I believe that I was looking at {{diff2|872055671|this change}}. A lot of |
: {{re|Elfgirl13}} I believe that I was looking at {{diff2|872055671|this change}}. A lot of banter can look like that, which is why I reverted, although further research shows several sources supporting this. Also worth consideration is [[WP:BLP]], which means that ideally sources would be independent (the church website most certainly is ''not'' an independent source), but it seems to indeed be the case. [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 23:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
{{reflist-talk}} |
{{reflist-talk}} |
||
== MegaNuke/MegaNuke Update == |
== MegaNuke/MegaNuke Update == |
||
Line 715: | Line 715: | ||
::Someone's already put my talk page up on the protection bit. I'm saying as the IP is a hopper evading a previous block. He threatened me that he would vandalise my page when his normal IP account is unbanned. [[User:LTPHarry|Luigitehplumber]] ([[User talk:LTPHarry|talk]]) 21:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
::Someone's already put my talk page up on the protection bit. I'm saying as the IP is a hopper evading a previous block. He threatened me that he would vandalise my page when his normal IP account is unbanned. [[User:LTPHarry|Luigitehplumber]] ([[User talk:LTPHarry|talk]]) 21:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
: {{ec|2}} {{re|LTPHarry}} I certainly can't do it, since I'm not an admin. To be honest, I don't think you're going to get your ''talk'' page protected without a more significant history of |
: {{ec|2}} {{re|LTPHarry}} I certainly can't do it, since I'm not an admin. To be honest, I don't think you're going to get your ''talk'' page protected without a more significant history of banter, see [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#User talk pages]]. You can certainly have your user page protected at your request - [[Special:Diff/876205561|this edit]] threatens your user page. [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 21:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
::Okay. His ban on his normal IP expires (I think) on the 9th of January, so maybe wait and see what happens then. Happy New Year as well! [[User:LTPHarry|Luigitehplumber]] ([[User talk:LTPHarry|talk]]) 21:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
::Okay. His ban on his normal IP expires (I think) on the 9th of January, so maybe wait and see what happens then. Happy New Year as well! [[User:LTPHarry|Luigitehplumber]] ([[User talk:LTPHarry|talk]]) 21:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
Line 805: | Line 805: | ||
== mr booth == |
== mr booth == |
||
since the point of adding to wikipedia was to reproduce it on his own twitter feed I would use some caution as to how much you pursue discussion; it appears to be just fodder for his followers. Just my opinion but at least one response to his |
since the point of adding to wikipedia was to reproduce it on his own twitter feed I would use some caution as to how much you pursue discussion; it appears to be just fodder for his followers. Just my opinion but at least one response to his banter has appeared on his twitter already.[[User:18abruce|18abruce]] ([[User talk:18abruce|talk]]) 22:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
== [[User talk:Poopoobrain3081|Poopoobrain3081]] == |
== [[User talk:Poopoobrain3081|Poopoobrain3081]] == |
||
Is a level 4 template necessary for the first offence? Normally, I start with a level 1 template, or a level 2 at the highest. I guess a high initial warning could be applicable for [[Hitler]]-related |
Is a level 4 template necessary for the first offence? Normally, I start with a level 1 template, or a level 2 at the highest. I guess a high initial warning could be applicable for [[Hitler]]-related banter. [[User:Anonymuss User|'''ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ''']] [[User talk:Anonymuss User|(ᴛᴀʟᴋ)]] 15:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
:You may directly issue a 4-im (final warning) template directly without going throguh all 4. There is no rules or policies restricting you from doing so. Serious |
:You may directly issue a 4-im (final warning) template directly without going throguh all 4. There is no rules or policies restricting you from doing so. Serious banter / troll should be reported to AIV right away without warnings per [[WP:DENY]]. '''―[[User:Abelmoschus Esculentus#s|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:green">Abelmoschus Esculentus</span>]]''' ('''[[User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus#s|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:orange">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contribs/Abelmoschus Esculentus|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:red">contribs</span>]]''') 15:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
: {{ec}} {{re|Anonymuss User}} Yeah, with a first edit like that, and the second edit using a racial slur like "Chink", I think it's pretty clear what further edits will be. Factoring in the username issue too, I think that one warning was enough, and any further similar editing would result in a [[WP:NOTHERE|NOTHERE]] block (as it has). [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 15:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC) |
: {{ec}} {{re|Anonymuss User}} Yeah, with a first edit like that, and the second edit using a racial slur like "Chink", I think it's pretty clear what further edits will be. Factoring in the username issue too, I think that one warning was enough, and any further similar editing would result in a [[WP:NOTHERE|NOTHERE]] block (as it has). [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 15:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
Line 966: | Line 966: | ||
{{reply to|Bellezzasolo}} Hello, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia but you left me a message I was disruptive editing but I'm not sure what I edit I did to get a warning. [[User:OverlordBaron|OverlordBaron]] ([[User talk:OverlordBaron|talk]]) 04:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC) |
{{reply to|Bellezzasolo}} Hello, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia but you left me a message I was disruptive editing but I'm not sure what I edit I did to get a warning. [[User:OverlordBaron|OverlordBaron]] ([[User talk:OverlordBaron|talk]]) 04:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
: {{re|OverlordBaron}} That relates to {{diff2|879996403|this edit}}. I clearly misread who added the |
: {{re|OverlordBaron}} That relates to {{diff2|879996403|this edit}}. I clearly misread who added the banter, sorry about that! [[User:Bellezzasolo|<span style="color: #bb9900">∰</span><span style="color: #00326a">'''Bellezzasolo'''</span><span style="color: #bb9900">✡</span>]] [[User talk:Bellezzasolo|<small>Discuss</small>]] 14:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
==[[Draft:Sam Enrico Williams]]== |
==[[Draft:Sam Enrico Williams]]== |
Revision as of 14:07, 9 February 2019
|
MentoringHi. At [1] I agreed to get some mentoring from you to know more about the interesting technical side of templates. However, I have a quick question. How does the mentoring process work? Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Um... other than the fact that you've completely moved around what looks like all of the parameters... ideally the merger target largely stay the same. For example, you've moved the |disciples= into the "Personal" section instead of being in the "religious career" section where it was originally. Primefac (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello Bellezzasolo, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Something is not right about my merge between Template:Infobox Bishopric and Template:Infobox diocese. Can you please help me out. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
User_talk:yanivThis seems to be a mistake - removing talk comments from other people, both Yaniv and TonyBallioni, particularly in the middle of an arbitration enforcement discussion. Tarl N. (discuss) 17:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Rail-interchange/sandboxJust to warn you that Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox contains my change to the alt text for the cable car, which should probably be abandoned rather than released. Discussion: Template talk:Rail-interchange#Template-protected edit request on 9 November 2018. Certes (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC) PadlocksHi Bellezzasolo, I don't have time tonight - but before we mass update all the padlock images, the files need to be uploaded locally and protected. — xaosflux Talk 04:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Is there a reason not to add them to the cascade-protected page? Pretty sure the old icons were/are. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
File mover grantedHello Bellezzasolo. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TheSandDoctor Talk 08:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
I finished another merge at User:Pkbwcgs/merge sandbox/4. It was Template:Infobox academic division and Template:Infobox university. Can you please have a look at it. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello Bellezzasolo,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC) It's a VIOLA. The reliable source is my ear. Find a Viola player and ask them. Jack Fallon played the Viola on this Beatles' recording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatle Curator (talk • contribs) 05:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatle Curator (talk • contribs) 05:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Revdel-rd3Template:Revdel-rd3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC) double standardPlease explain how JzG can revert my edits without explanation on the Gary Null article but if i do so it is considered disruptive. When i made the edits initially i explained the reason for them. He did not extend the same courtesy. if anything, he should be the one warned for disruptive editing. Or is he allowed to break the rules because he is an admin? Nonononocat (talk) 18:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Palace of WestministerOops, we reverted the vandal at the same time :) GoodDay (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Bellezzasolo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Help with map!Hello Belezzasolo! I saw your fine work on the AIEA locations map. I am trying to modify this page here which was clearly below acceptable levels https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Federation_of_United_Nations_Associations The thing is this organisation is membership-based. They got 100 or so members. I wanted to use your map to add all of them. The problems I am facing are: 1) I would like to use it outside of the sidebar 2) I would like to add a zoom effect on Asia/Oceania, South America and Africa too 3) it is quite "fragile" as it is because of the mutliple lines. Regarding "3" I found this map here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Airlines the code of which is more condensed. But it doesnt have the "zoom". Any help on any of the above would be very very much appreciated. Needles to say i'm not a pro.:)--APG1984 (talk) 20:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Notice that it's a bit yucky, because it's centered and the buttons go to the left. That's easily sorted.
I've made an attempt below and got the following problems :))) How can I: - chose the color of the pins and size ? (there is no line in the code that allows that or that mentions the svg file of the button) - avoid the problems that seem to appear with some locations which are correct (coordinates-wise) but wrong on the general map (everything is a bit lower). like cape town. see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:APG1984 - Also, on some other maps, pins apear correctly placed but outside of map Thanks a million. no rush, I imagine you got much more to do:) --APG1984 (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
This needs a review by the administratorsIt is about an anti-Semitic user who denies the existence of the Hebrew people at Talk:Hebrew language. This user is reported[3]
for 3RR violations and saved his ass unblocked. The result of the report is "page protected". So I please ask you for intervention. Because I saw you are the only one who noted that this user did an Obvious 3RR violation. The user denied any responsibility and claimed to have "misunderstood" the three revert rule. It is interesting that a year ago the user was reported again for a 3RR violation at the same article and pretended AGAIN to have misunderstood the rule, and in the report[4] from Iyyar, 5777 the 3RR was explained to the linguist: "Actually, the 3RR states: It is merge number 5! I can't believe I am on my fifth merge. I have merged Template:Infobox bus accident into Template:Infobox rail accident per TfD and Template:Infobox rail accident will be renamed soon after per TfD consensus. It seems to work. Can you please do the testcases and then tell me if it is ready to be implemented. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
94.193.245.74Thanks for your efforts, I have reported the IP at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:94.193.245.74 reported by User:Pkbwcgs (Result: ). Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Reverted edit in the article about Copenhagen metropolitan areaHi Bellezzasolo! I think you reverted my edit (i.e erasing a section in the article) by mistake. The article was about several definitions of the metropolitan area of Copenhagen. The definition presented in the section I was about to erase was a complete speculation by a wikipedian. The population and areal figures were indeed correctly sourced (as you pointed out). However, the areal division/definition (i.e which municipalities to be included in the definition) has never been mentioned elsewhere and were arbitrarily chosen by the wikipedian (since it lacked any source what so ever). Regards --NiccoUrban (talk) 00:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2018News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).
Interface administrator changes
ProblemI have a bit of a problem. The "canton" parameter in Template:Infobox university will not show up properly in articles and I have currently halted my bot from changing Infobox academic subdivision to Infobox university as this needs fixing. I have tried a range of things but it still won't show up and is causing problems. The article that this is a problem to is Mandarin Training Center. Can you please help out. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC) Believer's Eastern ChurchHello Bellezzasolo - I'm not sure why you said I didn't quote a reliable source when I edited the Believer's Eastern Church page[1]. The source I cited (and I cite a source) is the church's own website[2]. Can you please explain to me how that is not a reliable source? Thank you!--Elfgirl13 (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
References MegaNuke/MegaNuke UpdateHello Bellezzasolo! I lerned about your script a few days ago when Kb03 mentoned he had instlled it after I told him about the plain old MassRevert script. So I decied to install it. I have not used your script yet, but I can see it could be VERY useful when working with LTAs. So thank you for making it. Now that I have that out of the way, on to what I came to your talkpage to do. As the MegaNuke button has been moved to the Twinkle Menu, I have updated the docs to relfect that. Hope you don't mind! LakesideMinersMy Talk Page 12:32, 7 December 2018 (UTC) MegaNuke not workingHi Bellezzasolo. When I clicked in the "Nuke user" button, the script does not work. Could you fix that? Thanks ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 13:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' Noticeboard threadHello. I have raised the issue of Meganuke and whether it should have been implemented in a thread at AN. Please participate there. Carrite (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC) MfD nomination of User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/meganuke.jsUser:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/meganuke.js, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/meganuke.js and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/meganuke.js during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
What do you think of my merge between Template:Infobox campground and Template:Infobox holiday camp? Do you think that I can start implementing it or does it have any problems? Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018Hello Bellezzasolo,
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. A cup of tea for you!
NoticeYou recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 31, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Bradv🍁 21:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC) User scripts Newsletter - InvitationHi. Recently, I discovered a passion for created and understanding user scripts on wikipedia, and am planning to create a monthly newsletter about new scripts and related projects (created by anyone, not for simply promoting my own), as well as currently pending user script requests, Wikipedia-related JavaScript tips/tricks, and other related information. This message was sent to you because you are listed as a member of the user script developers category. If you would like to subscribe to this upcoming newsletter, please go to User:DannyS712/subscribe to scripts and add yourself. If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me。 --DannyS712 (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Happy holidays!
Merry ChristmasRedrose64 🌹 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Sir, Wikipedia should only have relevant and neutral details, and in no way do i intend to malign the editor's image.
The fact is that there are many haters of Anu Malik, and there have been many attempts to malign his image. Posting about someone life's controversy is in no way a neutral act. However, i should have given the reason as "Violation of NPOV policy". Sorry for that! Moreover, Wikipedia should only contain neutral, relevant and point to point details. I understand my responsibility as Wikipedia's editor and i assure you that whatever edit i do will be as per Wikipedia's rules only. Kindly reply about this to me within 48 hours, otherwise that portion is destined to be removed. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkupad (talk • contribs)
eurovision choir 2019eurovision choir 2019 isn't the correct way to write the name of this contest. The correct name of this contest is: Eurovision Choir of the Year 2019 Eurovision choir 2019 non è il nome corretto di questo programma i nome corretto è Eurovision Choir of the Year 2019 So this name should be changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michele1999 (talk • contribs) Issue with "admin highlighter" scriptGreetings,
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 1News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (December 2018). Hello everyone and welcome to the brand new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Stop this nasty IP address personThe only reason why that IP address user is vandalising my talk page is because I told him off for his rudeness. I don't think he'll ever go away as he hops between IPs. If you can, could you or an administrator lock my talk page from IP editing until this is all sorted? Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC) ≤:(talk page stalker) No need to protect the page. I blocked the IP. If they switch, have someone block the /64 for a short bit and you should be fine. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Happy New Year! Hello Bellezzasolo: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Happy New Year! Hello Bellezzasolo: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 05:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2019News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
GS evidence pageI corrected the link per your remark. Thanks for that. UninvitedCompany 19:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC) mr boothsince the point of adding to wikipedia was to reproduce it on his own twitter feed I would use some caution as to how much you pursue discussion; it appears to be just fodder for his followers. Just my opinion but at least one response to his banter has appeared on his twitter already.18abruce (talk) 22:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Is a level 4 template necessary for the first offence? Normally, I start with a level 1 template, or a level 2 at the highest. I guess a high initial warning could be applicable for Hitler-related banter. ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Because you thanked me
15:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Mukhtar Ansari is a Mafia Don turned Politician, please tell the whole truth, don't try to hide the factshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukhtar_Ansari — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.151.104.149 (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Are you trying to hide the fact, are you pedaling the false narrative, you should be ashamed of saying that a dreaded Mafia don is politician. We know the difference between a politician and a mafia don, for you it may not matter but ask the widows of several person who lost their husbands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.151.104.149 (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC) MastercardMany thanks for putting me right on the changes to the mastercard logo. Must confess I missed this change. Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 13:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
Help on request edi
Infobox school cleanup discussion enquiryHi Bellezzasolo, hope you're well. Not sure if you remember me, but you might remember me from the Infobox UK school TFD merge discussion we had a while back. The merge was a success which I'm really pleased, UK schools are benefiting from the improved look and additional parameters. Thanks for supporting the merge :) - I just wanted to ask if you would be interested in taking part in the Infobox school cleanup discussion on the Infobox school talk page? It's basically a full cleanup of the infobox such as list of parameters to be merged and deleted. There are already parameters listed under relevant subsections with a reason, it's mainly the merge and delete completely that needs comment on. You would only need to comment under each bullet point, you don't have to comment anything detailed, just simply "support" or "oppose" and signed would be good to help build consensus. Please let me know, thank you Steven (Editor) (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Canada Food GuideHello Bellezzasolo, Can you explain to my why you do not want the "Canada Food Guide" page updated? The new Food Guide was released to the public this week and the wiki page should reflect the new Guide. https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/ (Wholeplantfoodie (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)wholeplantfoodieWholeplantfoodie (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)) --Wholeplantfoodie (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Flooded with them hundreds' user scriptsDear all. Recently, our community lost a dedicated user, Flooded with them hundreds (talk). Among their projects were a number of user scripts that were deleted when they left. I (DannyS712) have asked that they be undeleted, and have taken over maintaining them. You currently import Flooded's (deleted) script, and I thought that you might want to import a working version. Links to each script are provided below. If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC) Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Care to explain disruptive editing warning?@Bellezzasolo: Hello, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia but you left me a message I was disruptive editing but I'm not sure what I edit I did to get a warning. OverlordBaron (talk) 04:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello Bellezzasolo, I thought I could disturb you this morning, sorry for that. I am drafting an article and would wish you go through it and propose changes to it. If you find it to be fit for the article page, you can at your capacity move. Kindly talk back so I can finish it up.Christopher Odhiambo (talk) 09:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a sourceHi Bellezzasolo. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in [Jeremy Ray Taylor]]. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC) Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 2News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (January 2019). Hello everyone and welcome to the second issue of the new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Toofan SinghCan you describe your addition of tag[5] to the article? Harmanprtjhj (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Shin Hyun-hwakHello! Your submission of Shin Hyun-hwak at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter – February 2019News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019). Interface administrator changes
DS alert scriptHi Bellezzasolo. I've used this script of yours twice in the last day, and both times it's behaved somewhat funny. First, I essentially need to click through twice to circumvent the edit-filter; I cannot just "confirm" my first attempt to give an alert (but I imagine this is intentional, and mention it only as a suggestion). When I do click through the second time, the popup window displays a message in red, saying "this user has been notified of the sanctions" or something similar. When I click on that message, it links to this edit of mine, which was completely unrelated to the users in question. Any help here? Vanamonde (Talk) 02:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Wilmot Elementary Page - "Not notable"Hi Bellezzasolo, Hope you're doing well! I saw you redirected my page on Wilmont Elementary because it wasn't notable enough. I'm new to editing on Wikipedia, I was hoping you might be able to share with me how best to determine if an institution is notable enough for a Wikipedia page. Thanks! --JohnAnderson1776 (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC) John Anderson
|