User talk:Glokc: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Copyright resolution for the Cluster analysis |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Also, please review the [[WP:COI]] policy. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 01:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC) |
Also, please review the [[WP:COI]] policy. [[User:HelpUsStopSpam|HelpUsStopSpam]] ([[User talk:HelpUsStopSpam|talk]]) 01:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
: Hello {{Ping|HelpUsStopSpam}}, thank you for the clarification about the copyright issues. Indeed some text was copied from the mentioned paper to the ''Evaluations'' section, however [https://github.com/eXascaleInfolab/clubmark/tree/master/docs the paper] was initially issued to the public domain under the [https://github.com/eXascaleInfolab/clubmark/blob/master/LICENSE ''Apache 2'' license] together with the source codes as stated in the [https://github.com/eXascaleInfolab/clubmark/ Clubmark project repository]. |
|||
: In addition, today the author(s) have emailed the permission to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org to use the paper under the ''(CC-BY-SA), version 3.0''. --[[User:Glokc|Glokc]] ([[User talk:Glokc#top|talk]]) 05:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:24, 11 February 2019
Glokc, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Glokc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
Use talk page for cluster analysis
[edit]Wikipedia is not a place to promote some research. Please use talk page before posting overhaul and obscure citations. And remember the 3RR rule. Limit-theorem (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for starting the discussion here, I was not sure how it's better to contact you. The articles are cites being proofs for the made statements, they belong to different authors and were published in the well known conferences or journals. Therefore, I believe this is the right way to write any proved and trusted statements referring to the peer-reviewed scientific papers.
- If you think than any fixed / added / extended statements or citations are wrong / controversial / irrelevant then please let me know what exactly instead of "undo" all my extensions, which I believe make the article more precise and up to date. --Glokc (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please, note that I have not deleted any of your or original material of the article, just corrected some statements citing the proofs for the made changes (and merging the original material to the modified version) and extended a lot based on the state-of-the-art research in the field, which is the field of my expertise. --Glokc (talk) 17:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Cluster analysis
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cluster analysis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://exascale.info/assets/pdf/icdm18_clubmark.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cluster analysis and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cluster analysis, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cluster analysis. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cluster analysis with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cluster analysis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Also, please review the WP:COI policy. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @HelpUsStopSpam:, thank you for the clarification about the copyright issues. Indeed some text was copied from the mentioned paper to the Evaluations section, however the paper was initially issued to the public domain under the Apache 2 license together with the source codes as stated in the Clubmark project repository.
- In addition, today the author(s) have emailed the permission to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org to use the paper under the (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0. --Glokc (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)