Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions
BlueMoonset (talk | contribs) m →Current nominations: moving one to correct (creation) date |
Anotherdoon (talk | contribs) →Articles created/expanded on February 12: Nominating Spectral G-index for DYK |
||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
===Articles created/expanded on February 12=== |
===Articles created/expanded on February 12=== |
||
<!-- After you have created your nomination page, please add it (e.g., {{Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}}) to the TOP of this section (after this comment).--> |
<!-- After you have created your nomination page, please add it (e.g., {{Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}}) to the TOP of this section (after this comment).--> |
||
{{Did you know nominations/Spectral G-index}} |
|||
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Kerb painting}} |
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Kerb painting}} |
||
{{Did you know nominations/Tulail Valley}} |
{{Did you know nominations/Tulail Valley}} |
Revision as of 18:16, 12 February 2019
- For instructions on how to nominate an article, see below.
This page is to nominate fresh articles to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page with a "hook" (an interesting note). Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area and then promoted into the Queue. To update this page, it.
Instructions for nominators
If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing. Further information can be found at the DYK guidelines.
Frequently asked questions
How do I write an interesting hook?
Successful hooks tend to have several traits. Most importantly, they share a surprising or intriguing fact. They give readers enough context to understand the hook, but leave enough out to make them want to learn more. They are written for a general audience who has no prior knowledge of or interest in the topic area. Lastly, they are concise, and do not attempt to cover multiple facts or present information about the subject beyond what's needed to understand the hook.
When will my nomination be reviewed?
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first, it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions below). Because of WP:DYKTIMEOUT, a nomination should be reviewed within two months since the reviewer/promoter may agree to reject and close an unpromoted hook after that time has passed.
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Instructions for reviewers
Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.
To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:
- Look through this page, Template talk:Did you know, to find a nomination you would like to comment on.
- Click the "Review or comment" link at the top of the nomination. You will be taken to the nomination subpage.
- The top of the page includes a list of the DYK criteria. Check the article to ensure it meets all the relevant criteria.
- To indicate the result of the review (i.e., whether the nomination passes, fails, or needs some minor changes), leave a signed comment on the page. Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:
If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a lineArticle length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* -->
showing you where you should put the comment. - Save the page.
- After the nomination is approved, a bot will automatically list the nomination page on Template talk:Did you know/Approved.
If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.
Advanced procedures
How to promote an accepted hook
At-a-glance instructions on how to promote an approved hook to a prep area
|
---|
For more information, please see T:TDYK#How to promote an accepted hook. |
Handy copy sources:
To [[T:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
To [[T:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
To [[T:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
To [[T:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
To [[T:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
To [[T:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
To [[T:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]
How to remove a rejected hook
- Open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to remove. (It's best to wait several days after a reviewer has rejected the hook, just in case someone contests or the article undergoes a large change.)
- In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line
{{DYKsubpage
with{{subst:DYKsubpage
, and replace|passed=
with|passed=no
. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.
How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue
- Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
- Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
- View the edit history for that page
- Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
- Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
- Add a transclusion of the template back to this page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from this page.
- If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.
How to move a nomination subpage to a new name
- Don't; it should not ever be necessary, and will break some links which will later need to be repaired. Even if you change the title of the article, you don't need to move the nomination page.
Nominations
Older nominations
Articles created/expanded on October 17
Articles created/expanded on October 25
Articles created/expanded on November 2
Articles created/expanded on November 11
Articles created/expanded on November 17
Articles created/expanded on November 19
Articles created/expanded on November 24
Articles created/expanded on November 27
Articles created/expanded on December 4
Articles created/expanded on December 5
Articles created/expanded on December 6
Articles created/expanded on December 10
Articles created/expanded on December 11
Articles created/expanded on December 13
Articles created/expanded on December 14
Articles created/expanded on December 20
Articles created/expanded on December 25
Articles created/expanded on December 27
Articles created/expanded on December 28
Articles created/expanded on December 29
Articles created/expanded on December 31
Articles created/expanded on January 3
Articles created/expanded on January 4
Articles created/expanded on January 7
Articles created/expanded on January 8
Articles created/expanded on January 13
Articles created/expanded on January 14
Articles created/expanded on January 21
Articles created/expanded on January 22
Articles created/expanded on January 23
Articles created/expanded on January 24
- Hi, I added a quote from the mayor of Moose Jaw.BrightOrion talk 09:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- The hook could be "Did you know that...some people have proposed giving Mac the Moose stilettos so that it reclaims its status as the world's tallest moose statue, a title currently held by The Big Elk?" BrightOrion talk 14:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- It has potential, but it might be a little too long. If there's no way to shorten it further without losing context, then I will accept it, however. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is six words shorter: Did you know that...The Big Elk is the world's tallest moose statue and some people want to give Mac the Moose stilettos so that it reclaims the title?BrightOrion talk 13:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly that sounds worse. Let's just stick with the original wording and let the promoter make adjustments if necessary. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for suggesting this for Did You Know.BrightOrion talk 13:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly that sounds worse. Let's just stick with the original wording and let the promoter make adjustments if necessary. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is six words shorter: Did you know that...The Big Elk is the world's tallest moose statue and some people want to give Mac the Moose stilettos so that it reclaims the title?BrightOrion talk 13:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- It has potential, but it might be a little too long. If there's no way to shorten it further without losing context, then I will accept it, however. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- The hook could be "Did you know that...some people have proposed giving Mac the Moose stilettos so that it reclaims its status as the world's tallest moose statue, a title currently held by The Big Elk?" BrightOrion talk 14:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I added a quote from the mayor of Moose Jaw.BrightOrion talk 09:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Let's just go with this hook, which is merely a rephrasement of what was proposed above Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC):
- ... that it has been proposed that the statue Mac the Moose be given stilletos to reclaim its status as the world's largest moose statue, a title currently held by The Big Elk?
- An alternative version Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- ... that as The Big Elk is now the world's largest statue of a moose, it has been proposed that Mac the Moose be given stilletos so as to reclaim its previous record?
Articles created/expanded on January 25
Articles created/expanded on January 26
Articles created/expanded on January 27
Articles created/expanded on January 28
Articles created/expanded on January 29
Articles created/expanded on January 30
Articles created/expanded on January 31
Articles created/expanded on February 1
Articles created/expanded on February 2
Articles created/expanded on February 3
Articles created/expanded on February 4
Current nominations
Articles created/expanded on February 5
Articles created/expanded on February 6
Articles created/expanded on February 7
Articles created/expanded on February 8
Articles created/expanded on February 9
Articles created/expanded on February 10
Articles created/expanded on February 11
Articles created/expanded on February 12
Special occasion holding area
The holding area has moved to its new location at the bottom of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.
- Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section above, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began; indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
- Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated (i) within seven days of creation or expansion (as usual) and (ii) between five days and six weeks before the occasion, to give reviewers time to check the nomination. April Fools' Day is an exception to these requirements; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.