Crouzeix's conjecture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Zyacobozzi20 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{one source|date=February 2019}} |
{{one source|date=February 2019}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Crouzeix's conjecture''' is an unsolved (as of 2018) problem in [[matrix theory]] proposed by Michel Crouzeix, which refines his following earlier proven '''Crouzeix's theorem''' |
'''Crouzeix's conjecture''' is an unsolved (as of 2018) problem in [[matrix theory]] proposed by Michel Crouzeix, which refines his following earlier proven '''Crouzeix's theorem''': |
||
: <math>|f(A)| \le 11.08 \sup_{z\in W(A)} |f(z)|</math> |
: <math>|f(A)| \le 11.08 \sup_{z\in W(A)} |f(z)|</math> |
Revision as of 01:44, 19 February 2019
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Crouzeix's conjecture is an unsolved (as of 2018) problem in matrix theory proposed by Michel Crouzeix, which refines his following earlier proven Crouzeix's theorem:
Here, denotes any function analytic on W(A), the field of values of a n×n (i.e. square) matrix A. Notoriously, the constant 11.08 is independent of the matrix dimension, thus transferable to infinite-dimensional settings. The not yet proved conjecture states that the constant is sharpable to 2:
Slightly reformulated, the conjecture can be stated as, that for all square matrices A and all polynomials p:
Here, denotes the maximum of , where z ranges over the numerical range of A. W(A) is defined as the set of Rayleigh quotients associated with A:
Or it can be reformulated as:
Here, the left part of the inequality denotes the spectral operator 2-norm and the right part denotes ∞-norm on the field of values:
While the general case is unknown, it's known that the conjecture holds for tridiagonal 3×3 matrices with elliptic field of values centered at an eigenvalue.
Further reading
- M. Crouzeix, "Bounds for analytical functions of matrices", Integral Equations and Operator Theory, issue 48 (2004), pp. 461–477