User:Helena12435/sandbox

{Article Evaluation exercise } Melodic Motion

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? In my opinion everything is quite relevant and nothing really distracted me except for the beginning when it was swapping between the different types of melodies.
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Nothing is missing. And it is all good to DATE.
• What else could be improved? I believe that there could be some examples in there.
• The tone is very neutral and a few things are under-presented . The kind of gloss over some of it.
• All the links work and valid. The sources come from creditable and neutral articles. They are more factual if anything.
• I don't see any ratings or talks.

Edit summary for my class ENGL1102.40 "A rose for Emily" This short story was about how shortly after her father's death, Emily discovers her necrophiliac intentions and would go on to kill her own husband. (http://xroads.virginia.edu/~drbr/wf_rose.html)

{EXERCISE EVALUATING A ARTICLE}

"Art THERAPY "

I plan to add more examples under the mental illness sections.

Art therapy

@J.O'kelley

(A ROSE FOR EMILY ARTICLES)(SYMBOLISM)

Who Arose for Emily?

This article is about 7 different symbols from a Rose for Emily. The main point of this article is to describe the different ways that these symbols are interpreted. It goes on about a gold chain, her body, the rose, the house, The neighbourhood, the bed, her eyes.

2. faulkners A rose for Emily

Jolie's peer review

Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?The article itself isn't bad but there are things that can definitely be added. There are things that are unnecessary, but at the same time there can definitely be some things that can be added. Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? There are a couple view left out but that is okay because we can add some. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? no it does not. Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? yes the sections are organized well. Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? Ye sir I believe i can. Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." There are a few but it isn't to bad. Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." Ye maa'am they do. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. nope.

Jolie's week 6 short story summary

This article is A Rose for Emily. It defines and goes further into the characters, and discussing their characteristics and qualities. It tells you about the structure of the short story. The theme is ""A Rose for Emily" discusses many dark themes that characterized the Old South and Southern Gothic fiction." It however doesn't discuss the symbolism. i plan to discuss the various symbols with three different article. Two which I already have. This article is pretty much a give from the short story and really doesn't go that much farther into debt.