User talk:Jhud9526/sandbox

I think you've added some important things so this, such as the gene-targeted testing for diagnosis. I think I would like to see more citations for the parts you are adding, ideally a citation for every sentence so that everything is backed up. I'd also recommend (which I'm sure you had planned) to go back and just do some proof reading because there's some errors there. Such as in the differential diagnosis section where you say "people with PTHS has to use behavioral".

(Scarlett)

ScarlettRidley (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Scarlett, Thank you for the feedback! All of the editing I have done so far all have citations. The parts that were copied and paste I did not copy and paste the citations. My apologies if it confused you. I have corrected the error. I changed "people with PTHS has to use behavioral" to "people with PTHS use behavioral". Thank you for catching that!Jhud9526 (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Jhud9526 peer review 2/17

Jhud9526, I think you are off to a great start! You started off with a good plan and immediately looked for good sources. I think it was a good idea that you chose the sections you did to contribute, they needed some work and it didn't seem like the information needed would be too hard to compile. I noticed that you've included some pieces of the article in your sandbox to work off of and I think that's a great idea too! From what you've added so far, your information seems neutral and pretty organized. I can't tell if you have included citations on what you've drafted yet, but I would suggest you do that next! Madihuddleston (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Madihuddleston, so far anything I have edited,that is italicized,has citations. The parts that does not have citations are the parts I copied and pasted to edit. I just did not copy the citations. I am sorry that I confused you. Thank you for your feedback! It is good to see that I am on the right track.Jhud9526 (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review

Jamika,

Thanks for making this page an accurate and well-edited article on a subject that I had never heard of before. The in-line citations are helpful and appropriate, and your contribution of a source is significant; in the case of a disease as rare as, it's important to understand what other diseases it can be mistaken for. As far as improvements, there is plenty of room for more information on differential diagnoses and treatment/accommodations. For instance, what are the similarities that exist between Pitt-Hopkins and Rett Syndrome and Angleman's Syndrome? How do professionals distinguish between the two?

Keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexyoung339 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Alexyoung339 for the feedback! I like your suggestion about adding the similarities between the three Syndromes and how professionals distinguish between them. That is something I have not thought of and I plan to add it. Thank you for the idea!Jhud9526 (talk) 04:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)