Talk:Dominic Caserta: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:37, 4 March 2019

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

California Unassessed

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Government Jobs

Hi all, I created a section on allegations again Caserta, but I am not super knowledgeable about local government, so if someone could proofread the article for proper verbage that would be great. Thanks! Basilosauridae (talk) 06:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual misconduct allegations

Hi, with the section regarding the allegations. The case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence. See hereThe level of detail that this section goes into is biased and one can only assume the additional mentions of what was allegedly said were politically motivated. I purposed that the article should be changed to state that the allegations were made, but the case was dismissed. With an unbiased level of detail for both sides. Thanks! WhistleRecall (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:32, 4 March 2019 edit WhistleRecall (talk \| contribs) 24 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:37, 4 March 2019 edit undo WhistleRecall (talk \| contribs) 24 edits →Sexual misconduct allegations Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	== Sexual misconduct allegations ==		== Sexual misconduct allegations ==
	Hi, with the section regarding the allegations. The case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence. [https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/08/15/no-charges-filed-in-dominic-caserta-sexual-harassment-scandal/ See here]The level of detail that this section goes into is biased and one can only assume the additional mentions of what was allegedly said ~~was~~ politically motivated~~. There is also no mention of there being a lack of evidence~~. I purposed that the article should be changed to state that the allegations were made, but the case was dismissed. With an unbiased level of detail for both sides. Thanks! [[User:WhistleRecall\|WhistleRecall]] ([[User talk:WhistleRecall\|talk]]) 22:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)		Hi, with the section regarding the allegations. The case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence. [https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/08/15/no-charges-filed-in-dominic-caserta-sexual-harassment-scandal/ See here]The level of detail that this section goes into is biased and one can only assume the additional mentions of what was allegedly said were politically motivated. I purposed that the article should be changed to state that the allegations were made, but the case was dismissed. With an unbiased level of detail for both sides. Thanks! [[User:WhistleRecall\|WhistleRecall]] ([[User talk:WhistleRecall\|talk]]) 22:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)