Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Siege of Malta (1565)/archive1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''NOTE''': This article was not created by me, but I have recently made many significant changes to it.[[User:Keith Azzopardi|Keith Azzopardi]] 14:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
*'''NOTE''': This article was not created by me, but I have recently made many significant changes to it.[[User:Keith Azzopardi|Keith Azzopardi]] 14:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''': FAC are not a way to improve an article, you should consider a [[Wikipedia:Peer_review|peer review]] instead. The text doesn't have a single inline citation; I think a lot of work is needed to get this to FA status. [[User:Jaqu|Jaqu]] 16:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''': FAC are not a way to improve an article, you should consider a [[Wikipedia:Peer_review|peer review]] instead. The text doesn't have a single inline citation; I think a lot of work is needed to get this to FA status. [[User:Jaqu|Jaqu]] 16:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I agree with [[User:Jaqu|Jaqu]]'s advice. [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 16:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:59, 18 November 2006
In my opinion this is one of the most important sieges ever to take place in the Mediterreanean history. Were it not for this siege, all of Western Europe would have become Muslim. Unfortunately few know about this event in Medieval History; therefore by niminating it for FA, others will come to appreciate it more and more. It is a pity that many Europeans waste a lot of time on unimportant things, and yet do not know their own history. I am aware of the fact that it might be too short, therefore I would appreciate it if you would edit it and help expant this article.
- NOTE: This article was not created by me, but I have recently made many significant changes to it.Keith Azzopardi 14:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: FAC are not a way to improve an article, you should consider a peer review instead. The text doesn't have a single inline citation; I think a lot of work is needed to get this to FA status. Jaqu 16:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Jaqu's advice. LuciferMorgan 16:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)