Template:Did you know nominations/Spectral G-index: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
other account |
Anotherdoon (talk | contribs) Respond to John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{Ping|Anotherdoon}} New and long enough, QPQ done, Earwig detects no copyvios. Best practice is that references should be placed after the text they support; there are several paragraphs with no citation at the end. Otherwise looks within policy. Slight tweaks to hook. [[User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)]] ([[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|talk]]) 05:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{Ping|Anotherdoon}} New and long enough, QPQ done, Earwig detects no copyvios. Best practice is that references should be placed after the text they support; there are several paragraphs with no citation at the end. Otherwise looks within policy. Slight tweaks to hook. [[User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)]] ([[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|talk]]) 05:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
::* Thanks for looking over the article. I think it's a bit odd to cite a source a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th time when the text is very clearly referring to the citation at the start of the paragraph. But that seems to be the preference, so I added the citations. I have dealt with all of the "citation needed" tags that were in the article, so hopefully it is ready to go now. [[User:Anotherdoon|Anotherdoon]] ([[User talk:Anotherdoon|talk]]) 14:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::* Regarding the hook, I understand the idea behind using the phrase [[color temperature]] instead of [[Color temperature|CCT]], but I worry that way more people are familiar with the abbreviation CCT than with the phrase "color temperature". Would it be ok to have [[color temperature|color temperature (CCT)]]? [[User:Anotherdoon|Anotherdoon]] ([[User talk:Anotherdoon|talk]]) 14:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 14:58, 8 March 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Spectral G-index
- ... that the European Commission's Joint Research Centre now recommends using the G-index instead of color temperature to select streetlights that have low blue light content?
Source: "the G-Index is proposed because CCT is not a perfect measure of blue light... The G-index value is directly related to blue light content, and so should be specified when light pollution effects on wildlife or on star visibility are a concern.[1]
Created by Anotherdoon (talk). Self-nominated at 18:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC).
@Anotherdoon: New and long enough, QPQ done, Earwig detects no copyvios. Best practice is that references should be placed after the text they support; there are several paragraphs with no citation at the end. Otherwise looks within policy. Slight tweaks to hook. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 05:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking over the article. I think it's a bit odd to cite a source a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th time when the text is very clearly referring to the citation at the start of the paragraph. But that seems to be the preference, so I added the citations. I have dealt with all of the "citation needed" tags that were in the article, so hopefully it is ready to go now. Anotherdoon (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Regarding the hook, I understand the idea behind using the phrase color temperature instead of CCT, but I worry that way more people are familiar with the abbreviation CCT than with the phrase "color temperature". Would it be ok to have color temperature (CCT)? Anotherdoon (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)