User:Gracelyn 36/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Gracelyn 36 (talk | contribs) Found some gap fillers for the WP article. |
Gracelyn 36 (talk | contribs) added info |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Draft |
Draft |
||
Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.<ref name=":0" /> Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.<ref name=":3" /> The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the ''helpee''.<ref name=":1" /> Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> |
Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.<ref name=":0" /> Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.<ref name=":3" /> The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the ''helpee''.<ref name=":1" /> There are two different forms of prosocial behaviors. Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> This indicates that one form is used for a more selfish result while the other is not. |
Revision as of 15:10, 11 March 2019
Wikipedia Work Cited
[1]Yeri Cho, and Nathanael J. Fast. “Lacking Status Hinders Prosocial Behavior among the Powerful.” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, Oct. 2018, pp. 1547–1560. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2224/sbp.6150.
[2]Moradi, Saleh, et al. “Flourishing and Prosocial Behaviors: A Multilevel Investigation of National Corruption Level as a Moderator.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1–25. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200062.
[3]Futamura, Ikumi. “Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior?” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, Apr. 2018, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196340
[4]Erlandsson, Arvid, et al. “Bullshit-Sensitivity Predicts Prosocial Behavior.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13,
no. 8, July 2018, pp. 1–12. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201474.
This is a user sandbox of Gracelyn 36. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ "Lacking Status Hinders Prosocial Behavior Amoung the Powerful".
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Flourishing and Prosocial Behaviors: A multilevel investigation of national corruption level as a moderator".
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable Than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior?".
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Bullshit-Sensitivity Predicts Prosocial Behavior".
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help)
===You've got some really good sources listed here. Read them enough to find information that helps fill content gaps in the WP article. Then you'll need to think about how best to integrate this information by introducing it and explaining its significance (think sandwich). That will require adding more specific text. Complete draft is due by March 11. JAirhart 16:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Draft
Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.[1] Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.[2] The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the helpee.[3] There are two different forms of prosocial behaviors. Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.[4] Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.[4] This indicates that one form is used for a more selfish result while the other is not.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
:0
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
:3
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
:1
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
:2
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).