Jump to content

User:Gracelyn 36/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Found some gap fillers for the WP article.
added info
Line 17: Line 17:
Draft
Draft


Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.<ref name=":0" /> Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.<ref name=":3" /> The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the ''helpee''.<ref name=":1" /> Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" />
Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.<ref name=":0" /> Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.<ref name=":3" /> The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the ''helpee''.<ref name=":1" /> There are two different forms of prosocial behaviors. Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.<ref name=":2" /> This indicates that one form is used for a more selfish result while the other is not.

Revision as of 15:10, 11 March 2019

Wikipedia Work Cited

[1]Yeri Cho, and Nathanael J. Fast. “Lacking Status Hinders Prosocial Behavior among the Powerful.” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, Oct. 2018, pp. 1547–1560. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2224/sbp.6150.

[2]Moradi, Saleh, et al. “Flourishing and Prosocial Behaviors: A Multilevel Investigation of National Corruption Level as a Moderator.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1–25. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200062.

[3]Futamura, Ikumi. “Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior?” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, Apr. 2018, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196340

[4]Erlandsson, Arvid, et al. “Bullshit-Sensitivity Predicts Prosocial Behavior.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13,

no. 8, July    2018, pp. 1–12. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201474.

  1. ^ "Lacking Status Hinders Prosocial Behavior Amoung the Powerful". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  2. ^ "Flourishing and Prosocial Behaviors: A multilevel investigation of national corruption level as a moderator". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  3. ^ "Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable Than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior?". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  4. ^ "Bullshit-Sensitivity Predicts Prosocial Behavior". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

===You've got some really good sources listed here. Read them enough to find information that helps fill content gaps in the WP article. Then you'll need to think about how best to integrate this information by introducing it and explaining its significance (think sandwich). That will require adding more specific text. Complete draft is due by March 11. JAirhart 16:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


Draft

Prosocial behavior improves organizations by increasing performance at both the group and organizational levels.[1] Cognitive abilities such as intelligence are positively related to prosocial preferences.[2] The association between a helper's well-being and helping behavior is greatly dependent upon the close tie between the helper and the helpee.[3] There are two different forms of prosocial behaviors. Ordinary prosocial behaviors are those involving relatively high situational and sociocultural demands.[4] Extraordinary prosocial behavior involves low situational and sociocultural demands.[4] This indicates that one form is used for a more selfish result while the other is not.

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference :3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference :2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).