Talk:CGI Inc.: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Revision as of 19:35, 1 April 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CGI Inc. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 26-9-2017 by Athaenara. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal C‑class Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article disgraces Wikipedia

This article is insulting to the very idea of Wikipedia. The page is wholly absent any substantive, or meaningful content, and it resembles a CGI website page more than an encyclopedic article. The mysterious deletions and selectively neglected details are astonishing. If this is the route we're going to take, why not just lock the article and turn it over to CGI to write themselves?

I hope this sort of activity is halted, and we can actually work together to construct a real page.

24.60.214.65 (talk) 23:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the opinions stated, though it is to some extent written to depict the company favorably. This isn't desirable but nor are the hatchet-jobs on companies written by editors with a general anti-business bias. I've made a few small edits, but there are referenced facts in here, and editors (including the complainant) would be better advised IMO on making constructive edits Chrismorey (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

« ... turn it over to CGI to write themselves »

That's exactly what we did, my dear ^_^ 64.86.141.134 (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bribery & corruption

The page contains dark hints of the above, but I don't see evidence of this in the talk page. Is it just scuttlebutt, or does someone have actual evidence that WP is being subverted? Chrismorey (talk) 00:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given there's been no evidence submitted either for or against the above, and the original statement was made in 2016, can I suggest the undisclosed payments flag is removed? Yeah, the article's a little on the long and positive side, but there's already the "undue bias" flag there. Darkerside (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CGI Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129045740/http://www.cms.gov/RAC/ to http://www.cms.gov/RAC/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update CGI.com links

Hello! I have updated a few links from HTTP to HTTPS. If a link was found to be broken, I quickly Googled for it and updated the link. I updated the main link to point to the proper homepage in English to stay coherent with user expectations. It drives me mad to be redirected automatically by a website towards the language it thinks I would enjoy based on my browser settings. To avoid this, all you have to do is just specify the language you want in the URL (when applicable). I did just that.

Hope all of this is useful! --Pinkythank (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving page to CGI, Inc.

Company name is CGI, Inc. not CGI Group. See sources below.

ESofmind (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]